首页|活动期系统性红斑狼疮患者血清补体C3、C4、C1q水平变化及其诊断和鉴别诊断效能

活动期系统性红斑狼疮患者血清补体C3、C4、C1q水平变化及其诊断和鉴别诊断效能

扫码查看
目的 观察活动期系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者血清补体C3、C4、C1q水平变化,并分析其对SLE的诊断效能,以及对SLE、SLE合并狼疮性肾炎(LN)的鉴别诊断效能。方法 活动期SLE患者45例(观察组),其中SLE合并LN者24例(LN者)、单纯SLE者21例(非LN者),同期健康体检者38例(对照组),采用免疫比浊法检测两组血清补体C3、C4、C1q。绘制ROC分析补体C3、C4和C1q对SLE的诊断效能,以及对SLE、SLE合并LN的鉴别诊断效能。结果 与对照组比较,观察组血清补体C3、C4、C1q水平降低(P均<0。05);与非LN者比较,LN者血清补体C3水平降低(P<0。05)。当补体C3临界值为0。915时,约登指数为0。646,其诊断SLE的灵敏度为77。78%,特异度为86。84%,ROC曲线下面积为0。863 7,95%CI为0。783 4~0。944 0,P<0。05;当补体C4临界值为0。155时,约登指数为0。592,其诊断SLE的灵敏度为64。44%,特异度为94。74%,ROC曲线下面积为0。826 6,95%CI为0。737 3~0。916 0,P<0。05;当补体C1q临界值为13。85时,约登指数为0。440,其诊断SLE的灵敏度为46。67%,特异度为97。37%,ROC曲线下面积为0。690 4,95%CI为0。574 2~0。806 5,P<0。05;当三者联合时,其诊断SLE的灵敏度为75。56%,特异度为92。11%,ROC曲线下面积为0。867 8,95%CI为0。790 0~0。945 7,P<0。05。当补体C3临界值为0。83时,约登指数为0。357,其鉴别SLE是否合并LN的灵敏度为83。33%,特异度为52。38%,ROC曲线下面积为0。691 5,95%CI为0。532 3~0。850 7,P<0。05;当补体C4临界值为0。165时,约登指数为0。268,其鉴别SLE是否合并LN的灵敏度为79。17%,特异度为47。62%,ROC曲线下面积为0。591 3,95%CI为0。420 9~0。761 6,P>0。05;当补体C1q临界值为17。1时,约登指数为0。345,其在鉴别SLE是否合并LN的灵敏度为91。67%,特异度为42。86%,ROC曲线下面积为0。637 9,95%CI为0。469 3~0。806 5,P>0。05;当三者联合时,其鉴别SLE是否合并LN的灵敏度为100。00%,特异度为38。10%,ROC曲线下面积为0。694 4,95%CI为0。535 3~0。853 6,P<0。05。结论 SLE患者血清补体C3、C4、C1q水平降低,检测三指标有助于SLE的诊断及鉴别SLE是否合并LN。
Changes in levels of serum complement C3,C4,and C1q in active systemic lupus erythematosus patients and their diagnostic and differential diagnostic value
Objective To observe the changes in levels serum complement C3,C4,and C1q of patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE),and to analyze their diagnostic efficacy for SLE as well as their differential diagnostic efficacy for SLE and SLE complicated with lupus nephritis(LN).Methods Forty-five patients with active SLE were en-rolled as the observation group,including 24 SLE patients with LN and 21 patients with SLE alone(non-LN group).Addi-tionally,38 healthy individuals undergoing routine health examinations were included as the control group.Serum levels of complement C3,C4,and C1q were measured using immunoturbidimetry.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were drawn to assess the diagnostic performance of C3,C4,and C1q for SLE and to evaluate their differential diagnostic ef-ficacy in distinguishing SLE and SLE with LN.Results Serum levels of complement C3,C4,and C1q were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(all P<0.05).The C3 level was lower in the LN group than in the non-LN group(P<0.05).When the cut-off value of C3 was 0.915,the Youden index was 0.646,with the sensitivity of 77.78%,specificity of 86.84%,and the area under the ROC(AUC)of 0.863 7 in diagnosing SLE(95%CI:0.783 4-0.944 0,P<0.05).When the C4 cut-off value was 0.155,the Youden index was 0.592,with the sensitivity of 64.44%,the specificity of 94.74%,and the AUC of 0.826 6 in diagnosing SLE(95%CI:0.737 3-0.916 0,P<0.05).When the cut-off value of C1q was 13.85,the Youden index was 0.440,with the sensitivity of 46.67%,the specificity of 97.37%,and the AUC of 0.690 4 in diagnosing SLE(95%CI:0.574 2-0.806 5,P<0.05).When the three factors were combined,the sensitivity in diagnosing SLE was 75.56%,the specificity was 92.11%,and the area under the ROC was 0.867 8(95%CI:0.790 0-0.945 7,P<0.05).When the cut-off value of C3 was 0.83,the Youden index was 0.357,and its sensitivity in differentiating whether SLE was accompanied by LN was 83.33%,its specificity was 52.38%,and the AUC was 0.6915(95%CI:0.532 3-0.850 7,P<0.05).When the cut-off value of C4 was 0.165,the Youden index was 0.268,and its sensitivity in differentiating whether SLE was accompanied by LN was 79.17%,its specificity was 47.62%,and the AUC was 0.591 3(95%CI:0.420 9-0.761 6,P>0.05).When the cut-off value of C1q was 17.1,the Youden index was 0.345,and its sensitivity in differentiating whether SLE was accompanied by LN was 91.67%,its specificity was 42.86%,and the AUC was 0.637 9(95%CI:0.469 3-0.806 5,P>0.05).When the three factors were combined,their sensitivity in differentiating whether SLE was accompanied by LN was 100.00%,their specificity was 38.10%,and the AUC was 0.694 4(95%CI:0.535 3-0.853 6,P<0.05).Conclusions The levels of serum complements C3,C4 and C1q in patients with SLE decrease.Detecting these three indicators is helpful for the di-agnosis of SLE and for differentiating whether SLE is accompanied by LN.

complement C3complement C4complement C1qsystemic lupus erythematosuslupus nephritis

钱香、杨平

展开 >

南京医科大学第一附属医院检验学部,南京 210029

南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院检验科

补体C3 补体C4 补体C1q 系统性红斑狼疮 狼疮性肾炎

2024

山东医药
山东卫生报刊社

山东医药

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.225
ISSN:1002-266X
年,卷(期):2024.64(36)