Since China proposed the disclosure of social responsibility reports by listed companies in 2006,research on social responsibility in the industry has maintained a growing trend.This article is based on 375 empirical studies and uses literature research to select four rating agencies with high frequency of use in China's academic community:RKS,SynTao Green Finance,Wind,and Bloomberg.Subsequently,qualitative analysis is used to analyze the data sources,rating methods,and characteristics of each rating agency for different agencies.Then,quantitative analysis is conducted on the correlation among total scores,environment,society and governance.And the paper analyzes the reasons for the low correlation between different indicators in the selection of indicators.Finally,it is hoped that this article can provide convenience for future research by scholars,encourage the government to strengthen the promotion of the importance of ESG,and achieve the goal of companies actively and independently disclosing social responsibility reports,thereby promoting the development of the green economy.
bibliometricscorporate social responsibilityESGrelativity