首页|F-AAS法与GF-A AS法测定工作场所空气中铬及其化合物方法比对

F-AAS法与GF-A AS法测定工作场所空气中铬及其化合物方法比对

扫码查看
采用357.9 nm波长条件下的火焰原子吸收光谱法(F-AAS法)和357.9、429.0 nm条件下的石墨炉原子吸收光谱法(GF-AAS法)分别测定工作场所空气中铬及其化合物,对检出限、精密度和准确度等多个指标作对比分析.结果表明,3种方法均能满足质量控制和职业卫生标准制定指南的要求;GF-AAS法在检出限和定量限方面优于F-AAS法,GF-AAS法测定结果在357.9 nm波长下优于429.0 nm,但在日常工作中的检测方法则需要根据工作场所的空气中铬的具体浓度高低的情况进行选择.
Comparison of Determination Methods Between F-AAS and GF-A AS for Chromium and its Compounds in the Air of Workplaces
The flame atomic absorption spectroscopy(F-AAS method)at a wavelength of 357.9 nm and the graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy(GF-AAS method)at 357.9 nm and 429.0 nm were used to determine chromium and its compounds in the air of workplaces.Multiple indicators such as detection limit,precision,and accuracy were compared and analyzed.The results indicate that all three methods can meet the requirements of quality control and occupational health standard formulation guidelines.The GF-AAS method is superior to the F-AAS method in terms of detection limit and quantification limit.The GF-AAS method has better results than 429.0 nm at a wavelength of 357.9 nm.However,in daily work,the detection method needs to be selected based on the specific concentration of chromium in the air of the workplace.

workplace air qualitygraphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopyglame atomic absorption spectroscopychromium

吴尧、周赠洪、舒千让、周洋、秦天

展开 >

重庆惠能标普科技有限公司,重庆 401121

工作场所空气 石墨炉原子吸收光谱法 火焰原子吸收光谱法

2024

山西化工
山西省煤化工发展促进中心 山西省化工学会

山西化工

影响因子:0.293
ISSN:1004-7050
年,卷(期):2024.44(12)