首页|生成式人工智能治理的法律回应

生成式人工智能治理的法律回应

扫码查看
生成式人工智能的规模化应用对社会治理造成了现实风险,其作为生产工具已具备了类人化的推理能力与行为能力,在知识产权领域、刑事领域、数据应用领域等引发的新生问题已超出了现行法律的规制范围,私人技术资本正在成为数字空间的真实权力拥有者.但现行人工智能的治理范式过分聚焦于算法规制,而忽视了相关责任主体的整体义务建构,导致法学理论无法适应新生技术的发展,对解决实际问题的现实方法论意义不强.面对生产力水平跃升引致的问题,法律规制特别是相关规则研究应靠前一步,以结构化的体系思维与完整的框架建构完善新一代人工智能治理范式,确保以规则优势引领产业发展优势与制度优势.
Infrastructure for Generative AI Governance
The large-scale introduction of generative artificial intelligence(AI)has caused real risks to social governance.As a production tool possessing humanized reasoning and behavioral ability,it has caused new problems in the field of intellectual property rights,criminal law,and data application,which have gone beyond the scope of existing laws.Private technology capital is becoming the real power holder in the digital space.However,the current AI governance paradigm focuses too much on the regulation of algorithms while neglecting the overall obligations of the relevant responsible subjects,leading to the failure of legal theories in catching up with the development of new technologies and weak practical methodological significance in solving practical problems.In the face of the problems caused by the hike in productivity level,the research on legal regulations,especially on relevant rules,should take a step forward,construct and improve the new generation of AI governance paradigm with structured system thinking and a holistic framework,and ensure that the rule advantages lead to the industrial development and institutional advantages.

generative AIsocial governancecyber violencedigital power

袁曾

展开 >

上海大学 法学院,上海 200444

生成式人工智能 社会治理 网络暴力 数字权力

上海市教育法学人才培养计划上海大学地方高水平大学2023年度建设项目教学改革与研究专项

2023JYFXR068N50-2023P0008

2024

上海大学学报(社会科学版)
上海大学

上海大学学报(社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.85
ISSN:1007-6522
年,卷(期):2024.41(1)
  • 40