首页|在线庭审当事人程序选择权的形态与保障

在线庭审当事人程序选择权的形态与保障

扫码查看
《民事诉讼法》规定在线诉讼需遵循自愿合法原则,以"经当事人同意"为条件,不得强制或变相强制.而根据司法解释,在线庭审中除非各方当事人明确表示反对或一方反对且有正当理由时不适用,否则应予适用.司法上在线庭审的变相强制与立法上在线诉讼的自愿原则似乎存在规范冲突与矛盾.此种"轻重错配"的程序设计与在线庭审在整个在线诉讼中的地位不相称,且容易侵害当事人的程序权益与实体权益.在"当事人同意"形态上,在线庭审不应设置得比在线诉讼的条件更为宽松.在线庭审应经当事人积极主动选择,并为其程序选择权的行使提供切实的程序保障,以彰显当事人的程序主体地位并进一步提升在线庭审的正当性.
On the Forms and Guarantees of the Parties'Choice of Procedure in Online Trial
The Civil Procedure Law stipulates that online litigation must follow the principles of voluntariness and legali-ty,with the condition of"obtaining the consent of the parties",and cannot be forced or indirectly forced.According to judicial interpretation,online court proceedings should be applied unless all parties explicitly object or if one par-ty objects with valid reasons.There seems to be a normative conflict and self contradiction between the disguised co-ercion of online court trials in the judiciary and the voluntary principle of online litigation in legislation.This contra-dictory program design is disproportionate to the position of online court proceedings in the entire online litigation,and can easily infringe on the procedural and substantive rights and interests of the parties involved.In the form of"party consent",online court proceedings should not be set with more lenient conditions than online litigation.On-line court hearings should be actively chosen by the parties involved,and provide practical procedural guarantees for the exercise of their right to choose procedures,in order to demonstrate the status of the parties as the subject of the proceedings and further enhance the legitimacy of online court hearings.

胡学军

展开 >

华东政法大学法律学院

在线诉讼 在线庭审 同步审理 异步审理 程序选择权

国家社会科学基金重大项目

18ZDA142

2024

社会科学辑刊
辽宁社会科学院

社会科学辑刊

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.578
ISSN:1001-6198
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 19