标准科学2024，Issue(3) ：44-51.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5698.2024.03.006

基于儿童安全座椅的德国ADAC测试与ECE R129法规差异性研究

Research on the Differences between German ADAC Testing and ECE R129 Regulations Based on Child Safety Seats

高国彬 李志昌 姜峰 任天杰 陈飞
标准科学2024，Issue(3) ：44-51.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5698.2024.03.006
✕
  • 维普
  • 万方数据

基于儿童安全座椅的德国ADAC测试与ECE R129法规差异性研究

Research on the Differences between German ADAC Testing and ECE R129 Regulations Based on Child Safety Seats

高国彬 1李志昌 1姜峰 1任天杰 1陈飞1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 南京海关纺织工业产品检测中心
  • 折叠

摘要

本文解析了德国ADAC测试与ECE R129法规的主要差异,梳理了德国ADAC测试方法及评分规则,结合ECE R129法规内容介绍了德国ADAC测试的主要项目,并进行了德国ADAC碰撞测试比对,期望帮助我国儿童安全座椅企业在产品设计时结合法规差异性,以在满足ECE R129法规的基础上取得更好的ADAC测试评分.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the main differences between the German ADAC testing and ECE R129 regulations,outlines the testing methods and scoring rules of the German ADAC testing,and introduces the main projects of the German ADAC testing based on the content of ECE R129 regulations.It also compares the collision tests of the German ADAC,hoping to help Chinese child safety seat producers combine regulatory differences in product design to achieve better ADAC testing scores while meeting ECE R129 regulations.

关键词

德国ADAC/ECE/R129/儿童安全座椅差异性分析

Key words

the German ADAC/ECE R129/difference analysis of child safety seat

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

南京海关科研项目(2022KJ34)

出版年

2024
标准科学
中国标准化研究院 中国标准化协会

标准科学

影响因子：0.32
ISSN：1674-5698
参考文献量6
段落导航相关论文