首页|惩一儆百:评级机构受罚的威慑效应

惩一儆百:评级机构受罚的威慑效应

扫码查看
在市场约束机制尚不健全的背景下,行政监管对于规范评级机构执业行为有着重要作用.本文基于2018年大公国际被监管部门处罚这一事件,探究监管处罚对其他评级机构评级行为的影响.研究发现,在该处罚事件公布后,其他评级机构显著提升了评级的谨慎程度,表现为主体及债项评级下调的概率增加,评级结果对企业预期违约风险与债券信用利差的解释力度增强.进一步分析发现,处罚影响的时效性集中在中短期.同时,处罚事件之后,评级机构针对违约债券的评级波动性降低,发生第一类错误的概率降低.对新发行债券而言,首次信用评级的投资者认可度提升.本文的研究结果表明监管机构的处罚措施发挥了较好的威慑效果,体现出了强化中介机构监管的积极意义.
Punish One to Warn Others:The Deterrence Effects of Credit Rating Agency Regulation
In the context of an incomplete market restraint,administrative supervision plays an important role in regulating the behavior of credit rating agencies(CRAs).In 2018,the China Securities Regulatory Commission(CSRC)and the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors(NAFMII)jointly announced that Dagong Global Credit Rating Co.,Ltd.had been suspended from its credit rating business for one year.We examine whether and how the other CRAs respond to such an event.We find that this strict regulation disciplines the other CRAs to issue more downgrades and improve their credit rating quality.Further evidence shows that the effects of this regulation are concentrated in the short and medium term.Moreover,the other CRAs reduce their rating volatility and the probability of Type Ⅰ errors after such regulation,and investors trust more on credit ratings when issuing new bonds.Our results suggest that CRAs respond by improving their credit rating quality when their market power is threatened by the possibility of further regulatory intervention.

credit rating agencybond marketregulationrating quality

吴育辉、张腾、唐浩博、张榕杰

展开 >

厦门大学管理学院 福建省厦门市思明区思明南路422号361005

评级机构 债券市场 监管处罚 评级质量

国家自然科学基金面上项目中央高校基本科研业务费专项

7237213820720201064

2024

世界经济
中国世界经济学会,中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所

世界经济

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.733
ISSN:1002-9621
年,卷(期):2024.47(5)
  • 56