首页|欧盟碳边境调节机制对中国贸易的影响:基于动态递归GTAP-E模型的模拟分析

欧盟碳边境调节机制对中国贸易的影响:基于动态递归GTAP-E模型的模拟分析

扫码查看
随着2023年5月16日欧盟碳边境调节机制(CBAM)正式生效,中国作为全球最大的出口国和CO2排放国将面临贸易成本上升的问题,这可能导致中国对欧盟出口的下跌.为探讨中国对外贸易的受损情况,文章依据欧盟碳边境调节机制最终文本的具体细则,设置了五种欧盟征收"碳关税"模拟情景进行GTAP-E预测.文章还讨论了欧盟碳边境调节机制对碳排放量的抑制作用以及如中国或全球其他国家实施与欧盟对等的碳边境调节机制的影响.研究发现:(1)欧盟实施CBAM会产生出口贸易转向效应,导致中国对欧盟出口下降的同时增加了中国对其他非欧盟国家的出口.(2)欧盟CBAM对中国不同行业的贸易影响呈现异质性.短期内,欧盟碳边境调节机制对出口的负面影响仅限于CBAM覆盖的产品;长期内全部产业出口都将受损.在所有国家和行业中,高碳排放国家和高碳强度行业受影响最为严重,尤其是中国因较大的出口基数和各行业的高碳强度导致了劳动密集产业和资本密集产业贸易的"双重对外转移",出口的恶化程度最为显著.(3)中国相比接受"碳关税",在国内发展碳市场既能确保较低的碳泄漏,又可实现较为显著的减排效果.且实际上,欧盟CBAM的实施对减排的影响较小,而对经济的抑制作用较为明显.尤其若全球均实施与欧盟对等的碳边境调节机制的情况下,中国的出口将急剧恶化,程度远大于对减排的影响.
Study on the Impact of EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on China's trade:GTAP-E model simulation analysis based on dy-namic recursion
With the formal establishment of the European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM)legislation in December 2022,China-the world's largest exporter and CO2 emitter,is poised to face increased trade costs,potentially leading to a decline in exports to the Europe-an Union.In order to thoroughly investigate the practical implications for Chinese trade,this paper,based on the specific provisions of the final CBAM legislation,sets up five scenarios of the EU imposing"carbon tariffs"and two scenarios of China implementing countermeasures in the form of"carbon tariffs".These scenarios are simulated using the GTAP-E model for prediction.Based on this,the paper still explores the CBAM's role in restraining carbon emissions,as well as the feasibility and necessity of China implementing countermeasures.According to the simulation results of GTAP-E model,it is found that:(1)the export loss of China to the EU is greater than the actual export loss of China due to the export trade di-version effect caused by the implementation of EU CBAM.(2)The impact of EU CBAM on the trade of different countries and industries is hetero-geneous:in the short term,the negative effects on exports are limited to products covered by CBAM,while in the long term,exports across all in-dustries will be suppressed.Among all countries and industries,high carbon-emitting countries and industries are most severely affected,especially due to the"double transfer"of trade caused by China's high carbon intensity in various industries,whose exports have deteriorated most significant-ly.(3)In terms of emission reduction,developing a domestic carbon market in the case of extremely low carbon leakage is more effective than"carbon tariffs,"and the imposition of"carbon tariffs"has a greater inhibitory effect on the economy than its emission reduction effect.(4)The necessity for implementing countermeasures is relatively low.On one hand,when China implements countermeasures independently,the export im-provement of various industries is minimal;on the other hand,in a scenario where countermeasures are globally implemented,China will face even greater export losses.

丁纯、曹雪琳

展开 >

复旦大学世界经济研究所

复旦大学经济学院

欧盟CBAM出口量 贸易转向效应 双重对外转移 碳排放量

国家社会科学基金重大研究专项

20VGQ012

2024

世界经济研究
上海社科院世界经济研究所

世界经济研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.401
ISSN:1007-6964
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 1
  • 61