首页|试论结果标记与条件句的互动关系——以中古汉语结果标记使用为例

试论结果标记与条件句的互动关系——以中古汉语结果标记使用为例

扫码查看
中古汉语条件句结果标记类型丰富,常见的七个结果标记"乃、即、必、辄、便、当、皆"在条件句中句法功能和语义特征表达有很大差异,由此说明结果标记对条件句之间同样存在着互动关系.结果标记的粘合功能强弱与条件句小句融合程度成正相关,并形成"[皆>便>辄]>[当/必/即/乃]"的粘合功能连续统.结果标记主观性强弱与条件句小句连接的语义层次分布密切相关,七个结果标记所在条件句主要分布在主观性较低的情状层和态度层,并形成一个主观性连续统"必、当>乃>皆、便>辄、即".
Interaction Between Apodosis Markers and Conditionals:Taking the Use of Apodosis Markers in Middle Ancient Chinese as an Example
The apodosis markers in middle ancient Chinese conditionals are abundant.The seven common apodosis markers"nai(乃),ji(即),bi(必),zhe(辄),bian(便),dang(当),jie(皆)"differ greatly in their syntactic functions and semantic features in conditionals.This shows that there is also an interactive relationship between apodosis markers and conditionals.There was a positive correlation between the cohesive function of apodosis markers and the degree of integration between conditional clauses deep in linguistics,and form a functional continuum of"[皆>便>辄]>[当/必/即/乃]".The subjectivity of apodosis markers is closely related to the semantic levels in conditional clause linkage.The conditionals with these apodosis markers are mainly distributed in the situation level and judge level with lower subjectivity.And this markers form a subjectivity continuum of"必,当>乃>皆,便>辄,即".

conditionalsapodosis marker"nai(乃),ji(即),bi(必),zhe(辄),bian(便),dang(当),jie(皆)"cohesive functionfive levels in clause linkage

孙雅平

展开 >

湖南第一师范学院 文学与新闻传播学院,湖南 长沙 410205

条件句 结果标记 "乃、即、必、辄、便、当、皆" 粘合功能 小句连接的五个层次

湖南省教育厅科学研究优秀青年项目国家社科基金语言学重大项目

21B081616ZD207

2024

石家庄学院学报
石家庄学院

石家庄学院学报

影响因子:0.223
ISSN:1673-1972
年,卷(期):2024.26(2)
  • 1
  • 32