首页|针灸推拿等中医特色非药物疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的网状Meta分析

针灸推拿等中医特色非药物疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的网状Meta分析

Network Meta-analysis of Non-drug Therapy of Traditional Chinese Medicine such as Acupuncture and Massage in Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

扫码查看
目的:系统评价针刺、推拿等非药物疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效.方法:检索国家知识基础设施数据库(CNKI)、中国学术期刊数据库(CSPD)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和PubMed、Cochrane Library文献数据库,利用贝叶斯网状Meta分析方法,纳入针刺、推拿、牵引以及灸法单一或联合使用治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照试验,根据Co-chrane 协作网推荐的偏倚风险工具对纳人文献进行质量评价,使用RevMan 5.3软件制作成偏倚风险图,Ge MTC.0.14.3软件对数据进行网状Meta分析,通过Stata 16.0软件制作网状图、累计排序图、预测区间图以及比较-校正漏斗图.结果:共纳入28篇随机对照试验研究,2 771例患者,共有10种干预措施,网状Meta分析结果显示:总有效率:针刺+推拿,推拿+牵引,针刺+灸法,针刺+牵引,推拿+灸法,针刺+推拿+牵引结果优于单独牵引;针刺+推拿,针刺+灸法优于单独灸法或单独针刺;针刺+推拿,针刺+灸法以及推拿+牵引有效率优于单独推拿.视觉模拟评分(VAS):针刺+灸法优于单纯推拿,针刺+灸法,针刺+推拿+牵引优于单纯牵引.结论:在总有效率方面,针刺+推拿疗效最佳;在缓解疼痛方面,针刺+牵引可能是最优的选择,不同干预措施可能存在叠加效应且叠加效果有限.
Objective:This paper aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture,massage,and other non-drug therapies in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods:The databases of CNKI,CSPD,CBM,PubMed,and Cochrane Library were searched.Bayesian mesh meta-analysis was used,and a randomized controlled trial for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation was conducted,with acupuncture,massage,traction,and moxibustion used respectively or jointly.The quality of the included litera-ture was evaluated according to the bias risk tool recommended by Cochrane.The bias risk map was prepared using RevMan 5.3 software,and the network meta-analysis of the data was performed by Ge MTC.0.14.3.Stata 16.0 software was used to make a net-work diagram,cumulative sorting diagram,prediction interval diagram,and comparative-correction funnel diagram.Results:A total of 28 randomized controlled trials were included,with 2 771 subjects and 10 interventions.The network meta-analysis results showed that the total effective rate of acupuncture+massage,massage+traction,acupuncture+moxibustion,acupuncture+trac-tion,massage+moxibustion,and acupuncture+massage+traction was better than that of traction alone.Acupuncture+massage and acupuncture+moxibustion were better than moxibustion or acupuncture alone.The effective rate of acupuncture+massage,ac-upuncture+moxibustion,and massage+traction was better than that of massage alone.The visual analogue scale(VAS)of acu-puncture+moxibustion was better than that of simple massage,while acupuncture+moxibustion and acupuncture+massage+trac-tion were better than simple traction.Conclusion:Acupuncture+massage has the best effect in terms of total effective rate.In terms of pain relief,acupuncture+traction may be the optimal choice,and different interventions may have limited additive effects.

Lumbar spineIntervertebral discNon-drug therapyAcupunctureMassageTractionNetwork Meta-analysis

时福东、张世民、陈春、靳蛟、林海、莫靖煊

展开 >

中国中医科学院望京医院,北京,100102

腰椎 椎间盘 非药物治疗 针灸 推拿 牵引 网状Meta

北京市中医药科技发展资金项目

JJ-2020-75

2023

世界中医药
世界中医药学会联合会

世界中医药

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.266
ISSN:1673-7202
年,卷(期):2023.18(23)
  • 39