全自动尿液分析系统与显微镜手工法在急性尿路感染诊断中的优劣对比
Comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of automatic urine analysis system and manual microscopy in the diagnosis of acute urinary tract infection
张芸 1尉春苗1
作者信息
- 1. 淄博市第一医院检验科/淄博市分子免疫检验医学重点实验室,山东淄博 255200
- 折叠
摘要
目的 研究分析急性尿路感染诊断中全自动尿液分析系统与显微镜手工法的优劣势.方法 将2023年1月至2023年6月期间医院接收的疑似急性尿路感染患者500例作为研究对象,以干化学法为筛查标准.对所有患者分别采用全自动尿液分析系统与显微镜手工法进行检验,观察比较两种技术的检测用时、对急性尿路感染的诊断准确性.结果 全自动尿液分析系统检测用时短于显微镜手工法,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);全自动尿液分析系统诊断准确性与显微镜手工法比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 全自动尿液分析系统与显微镜手工法均可应用于急性尿路感染的诊断.显微镜手工法具有较高的诊断准确率,但全自动尿液分析系统检测用时较短,优势更明显,值得临床推广应用.
Abstract
Objective:To study and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of automatic urine analysis system and microscope manual method in the diagnosis of acute urinary tract infectionMethods:500 patients with suspected acute urinary tract infection admitted to the hospital from January 2023 to June 2023 were taken as the research object,and dry chemistry method was used as the screening standard.All patients were tested by automatic urine analysis system and microscope manual method respectively,and the detection time and diagnostic accuracy of acute urinary tract infec-tion were observed and compared.Results:The detection time of automatic urine analysis system was shorter than that of manual microscope method,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no statistical difference between the diagnostic accuracy of automatic urine analysis system and that of microscope manual method(P＞0.05).Conclusion:Both automatic urine analysis system and microscope manual method can be applied to the di-agnosis of acute urinary tract infection.The manual microscope method has a high diagnostic accuracy,but the auto-matic urine analysis system has a shorter detection time and more obvious advantages,which is worthy of clinical ap-plication.
关键词
全自动尿液分析系统/急性尿路感染/显微镜手工法Key words
Fully automated urine analysis system/Acute urinary tract infection/Manual microscopy method引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据