首页|伊布利特与电复律用于心房颤动射频消融术中复律的临床效果对比

伊布利特与电复律用于心房颤动射频消融术中复律的临床效果对比

扫码查看
目的 对比伊布利特与传统电复律用于持续性心房颤动射频消融术中的临床效果.方法 按照纳入与排除标准选择柳州市工人医院心内科 2022 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月行射频消融术的持续性房颤患者 80 例,将患者分为使用伊布利特复律的药物复律组、使用 150-200J 双向电复律的电复律组,每组 40 例.对比两组复律成功率与不良反应情况.结果 两组复律成功率对比,电复律组高于药物复律组,P<0.05.两组复律期间不良反应发生率对比,P>0.05.结论 针对行射频消融术的持续性房颤患者,相比使用伊布利特复律,采用传统电复律的成功率更高,但两者在引发不良反应方面无明显差异.
Comparison of Clinical Effects of Ibrahimovic Park Jung Su and Electric Cardioversion in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Objective:To compare the clinical effects of Ibrahimovic Park Jung Su and traditional cardioversion in ra-diofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.Methods:According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,80 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent radiofrequency ablation from January 2022 to March 2024 in the Department of Cardiology,Liuzhou Workers'Hospital were selected,and they were divided into drug cardio-version group using Ibuprofen and electric cardioversion group using 150-200J bidirectional cardioversion,with 40 patients in each group.The success rate and adverse reactions of cardioversion were compared between the two groups.Results:The success rate of cardioversion between the two groups was higher in electric cardioversion group than in drug cardioversion group,P<0.05.The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups during card-ioversion was compared,P>0.05.Conclusion:Compared with Ibrahimovic-Park Jung Su cardioversion,the tradi-tional cardioversion has a higher success rate for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency ablation,but there is no significant difference between them in causing adverse reactions.

Ibrahimovic Park Jung SuAtrial fibrillationElectrical cardioversionRadiofrequency ablation

沈斌、潘程婕

展开 >

柳州市工人医院,广西柳州 545000

伊布利特 心房颤动 电复律 射频消融术

2024

生命科学仪器
北京市北分仪器技术公司

生命科学仪器

影响因子:0.305
ISSN:1671-7929
年,卷(期):2024.22(3)
  • 3