首页|FAST宁静区生态脆弱性时空演变及情景模拟

FAST宁静区生态脆弱性时空演变及情景模拟

扫码查看
[目的]揭示FAST宁静区2000-2020年的生态脆弱性时空变化特征,为维护该区域的生态安全提供科学参考。[方法]基于FAST宁静区生态本底特征,从"敏感性—恢复力—压力度"角度构建生态脆弱性评价体系,运用AHP-熵权法和GIS技术等对FAST宁静区2000-2020年生态脆弱性时空演变及未来预设情景进行了量化分析。[结果](1)研究区脆弱性以中度脆弱为主,轻度、中度、重度脆弱区合计占75%左右,微度和极度脆弱区合计只占约25%。(2)20年间研究区生态脆弱性整体下降,高强度生态脆弱区主要向较低等级转化,前10 a生态脆弱性略有上升,而后10 a生态脆弱性明显降低,研究区生态环境整体呈改善的趋势。(3)从FAST圈层(核心区、中间区、边远区)动态变化看,核心区的生态得到较好的改善,恶化区面积占比由前10 a的19。57%降至7。12%,而稳定区和低度改善区的面积在上升,由前10 a的79。88%增至92。50%;中间区和边远区变化趋于稳定,中间区稳定区和低度改善区面积占比由68。36%增至87。10%,而边远区稳定区占比由40。78%增至59。50%,但边远区局部存有恶化风险。(4)基于生态优先保护和乡村振兴需求两种情景模拟,2030年FAST宁静区的生态脆弱性整体指数分别下降5。91%和2。22%,前者生态保护效果较优,但后者更好地兼顾生态保护和乡村发展需要,综合考虑建议推荐乡村振兴发展模式。[结论]研究时段内,FAST宁静区生态脆弱性整体降低,核心区生态环境改善明显,中间区、边远区后10 a相比前10 a整体生态在缓慢转好。
Spatiotemporal evolution and scenario simulation of ecological vulnerability in the FAST Tranquility Zone
[Objective]The aims of this study are to reveal the spatial and temporal characteristics of ecological vulnerability in the FAST Tranquility Zone from 2000 to 2020,and to provide scientific references for the maintenance of ecological security in this region.[Methods]Based on the ecological baseline characteristics of the FAST Tranquility Zone,an ecological vulnerability assessment system was established from the perspectives of sensitivity-recovery-pressure.The spatiotemporal evolution of ecological vulnerability and future preset scenarios from 2000 to 2020 in the FAST Tranquility Zone were quantitatively analyzed using the AHP-Entropy Weight method and GIS technology.[Results](1)The vulnerability in the study area was primarily moderate,with mild,moderate,and severe vulnerable areas accounting for approximately 75%,and slightly and extremely vulnerable areas accounting for about 25%.(2)Over the 20-year period,the ecological vulnerability of the study area had decreased overall,with high-intensity vulnerable areas mainly transforming to lower severity levels.There was a slight increase in ecological vulnerability in the first decade,followed by a significant decrease in the second decade,indicating an overall improving trend in the ecological environment of the area.(3)With respect to the dynamic changes in the FAST concentric zones(core area,intermediate area,and remote area),the ecology of the core area had been considerably improved,with the proportion of the deteriorated area decreasing from 19.57%in the first decade to 7.12%in the second decade.The areas of stability and slight improvement had increased,from 79.88%in the first decade to 92.50%.The intermediate area and remote area showed a trend towards stabilization,with the proportion of stable and slightly improved areas in the intermediate area increasing from 68.36%to 87.10%,and the proportion of stable areas in the remote area increasing from 40.78%to 59.50%,although there were risks of deterioration in some parts of the remote area.(4)Based on the simulation of ecological priority protection and rural revitalization needs,the overall ecological vulnerability index of the FAST Tranquility Zone was projected to decrease by 5.91%and 2.22%,respectively,by 2030.The former scenario showed better ecological protection effects,while the latter more effectively balanced ecological conservation with rural development needs.Considering both,it was recommended to prioritize the rural revitalization development model.[Conclusion]During the study period,the ecological vulnerability of the FAST Tranquility Zone had decreased overall,with the core area showing significant ecological improvement,and the intermediate and remote areas showing a slow but overall positive ecological transition in the latter decade compared to the first.

ecological vulnerabilityspatial and temporal evolutionscenario simulationsFAST Tranquility Zonecircle change

黄贤凤、苏维词、勾容、权小丫

展开 >

重庆师范大学 地理与旅游学院,重庆 401331

贵州省山地资源研究所,贵阳 550001

生态脆弱性 时空演变 情景模拟 FAST宁静区 圈层变化

2025

水土保持研究
中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所

水土保持研究

北大核心
影响因子:1.194
ISSN:1005-3409
年,卷(期):2025.32(2)