首页|食物质量差异对树麻雀能量预算和消化道形态特征的影响

食物质量差异对树麻雀能量预算和消化道形态特征的影响

扫码查看
为阐明树麻雀对不同食物的能量预算对策,对3组树麻雀(Passer montanus)进行了2周的食物质量差异性驯化.结果表明,分别饲喂黄粉虫、谷子和草籽种子的3组树麻雀的摄入能和消化能依次递减,组间差异均为极显著( P<0.001).与谷子组比较,高能食物(黄粉虫)组摄人能和消化能增加极显著(P<0.001),增加分别为52.77%和52.71%.消化率增加不显著(P>0.05),体内能量储备增加;与谷子组比较,低能食物(草籽种子)组摄入能、消化能和消化率降低极显著(P<0.001),摄入能和消化能降低,分别为17.54%和25.67%,体内能量储备消耗极显著(P<0.001).3组树麻雀的个体能值水平,包括体重、体温、体脂含量和水分含量均表现出显著的组间差异(P<0.05).器官水平出现相应的变化,小肠和总消化道长度以及肝脏重量出现极显著的表型可塑性响应.因此,低生存压力条件下,树麻雀对不同食物采用了不同的能量预算策略.进食高能食物时,增加摄入能、提高消化率来获能,收入大于支出部分的能量转化为体内的能量储备;进食低能食物时,保持或适当降低原有的摄能水平和降低体温的节能预算,收入小于支出的部分能量则通过分解体内的能量储备物获能.体内能量储备增减的预算、能量摄入和能量转化器官的能力与自身能耗之间的预算,以及摄食低能食物时的节能预算均是树麻雀能量预算策略的重要组成部分.总之,树麻雀对不同含能食物采用不同的能量预算策略,器官水平的表型可塑性响应是个体能值出现显著变化的基础,也是个体能量预算策略成功的关键,对不同食物采用不同的能量预算策略是树麻雀重要的生存对策.
The influence of different food qualities on the energy budget and digestive tract morphology of Tree Sparrows passer montanus
For comparing and contrasting the energy budget strategies of Passer montanus with different food qualities, a two-week acclimation treatment with three groups of P. montanus was conducted. The results showed that three groups, by feeding Ttenebrio molitor. Setaria italica and Echinochla crusgalli respectively, decreased successively in ingestive energy and digestible energy and had significant differences between these groups ( P<O. 001) . Compared with the S. italica group, the group with energy dense foods ( T. molitor) increased remarkably by 52. 77% and 52. 71% respectively in ingestive energy and digestible energy (P<O. 001) . The digestibility ratio had a increase tendency but did not in a marked level (P>O. 05) and the energy reserves in the body grew. While the group with low-energy foods showed marked decrease (P<O. 001) of 17. 54% and 25. 67% in ingestive energy, digestible energy respectively. The digestibility drop and the energy reserves in the body were consumed greatly (P<O. 001). The individual energy values of three groups of P.montanus , including the body weight , temperature , percentage of body fat and water content , all revealed great differences among these groups (P<O. 05 ) . The organ level varies correspondently: small intestine, alimentary tract and the liver weight all had phenotypic plasticity reactions. Therefore , under the living pressure, P. montanus adopted different energy budget strategies towards different foods : ingestive and digestibility energy increased for high-energy foods with extra energy tumed into inner reserves; sustained or even lowered level of energy capture and energy-saving budget through temperature drop for low-energy foods with insufficient energy gained by resolving the reserves. The budget of the variation of body energy reserves, the budget of the energy intake, the functional capability of energy-converting organs and the energy consumption and the energy-saving budget in taking low-energy foods are important parts of the energy budget strategies for P. montanus. In all, P. montanus adopts different energy budget strategies towards foods of different energy. The phenotypic plasticity reactions of organs serve as the basis of remarkable changes in the individual energy value and also the key to the success of individual energy budget strategies. Different energy budget strategies towards different foods is an important survival game for the P. montanus.

tree sparrow ( Passer montanus)foodenergy intakedigestible energydigestive tract morphologyenergybudget strategy

杨志宏、邵淑丽

展开 >

齐齐哈尔大学生命科学与农林学院,齐齐哈尔161006

树麻雀 食物 摄入能 消化能 消化道形态特征 能量储备

黑龙江省自然科学基金黑龙江省教育厅科学技术研究项目

C20062411511447

2011

生态学报
中国生态学学会,中国科学院生态环境研究中心

生态学报

CSTPCDCSCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.191
ISSN:1000-0933
年,卷(期):2011.31(14)
  • 9
  • 18