首页|PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC的效果及对肿瘤标志物、预后的影响

PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC的效果及对肿瘤标志物、预后的影响

扫码查看
目的:探究PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的效果及对肿瘤标志物、预后的影响。方法:回顾性选取2020。6~2023。6间收治的处于Ⅲ B期~Ⅳ期NSCLC患者为研究对象,依据其治疗方案分为化疗组(n=32,培美曲塞/紫杉类+铂类化疗方案)和联合组(n=36,免疫抑制剂+培美曲塞/紫杉类+铂类化疗方案),治疗至少2个周期后比较两组实体瘤治疗效果[疾病控制率(DCR)、客观缓解率(ORR)],随访预后生存情况[无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)],比较治疗期间药物不良反应,比较两组治疗前、治疗2个周期后的血清生化指标[癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段抗原(CY-FRA21-1)和白蛋白(ALB)]水平变化。结果:治疗2个周期后,联合组DCR(83。33%vs 59。38%)显著高于化疗组(P<0。05),但ORR(58。33%vs40。63%)与化疗组比较无显著差异(P>0。05);随访18个月,联合组PFS为(11。44±1。81)个月,死亡11例,OS为(15。17±1。42)个月;化疗组PFS为(6。87±3。05)个月,死亡16例,OS为(11。91±1。09)个月,联合组PFS显著高于化疗组(log rank x2=4。377,P<0。05),两组OS比较无显著差异(logrank x2=3。442,P>0。05);治疗期间,两组药物不良反应总发生率比较无显著差异(P>0。05);治疗2个周期后,两组CEA和CY-FRA21-1水平逐渐降低(P<0。05),ALB水平显著升高(P<0。05),且联合组治疗2个周期指标变化显著高于化疗组(P<0。05)。结论:PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC效果良好,可显著抑制肿瘤发展进程,延长患者PFS,改善预后,值得推荐。
Effect of PD-1 Immunosuppressant Combined with Chemotherapy in Treating Advanced NSCLC and Its Influence on Tumor Markers and Prognosis
Objective:To explore the effect of PD-1 immunosuppressant combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)and its influence on tumor markers and prognosis.Methods:Patients with stage Ⅲ-B-ⅣNSCLC admitted from June 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects,and were divided into chemotherapy group(n=32,pemetrexed/paclitaxel+platinum chemotherapy regimen)and combined group(n=36,camrelizumab+pemetrexed/paclitaxel+platinum chemotherapy regimen).The solid tumor treatment effect[disease control rate(DCR),objective response rate(ORR)]and follow-up prognosis and survival[progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS)]after at least 2 cycles of treatment,adverse drug reactions during treatment and levels of serum biochemical indicators[carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen(CY-FRA21-1),albumin(ALB)]before treatment and after 2 cycles of treatment were compared between both groups.Results:After 2 cycles of treatment,DCR in combined group was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy group(83.33%vs 59.38%)(P<0.05),but ORR was not significantly different from that in chemotherapy group(58.33%vs 40.63%)(P>0.05).After 18 months of follow-up,the PFS,the number of dead cases and OS in combined group were(11.44±1.81)months,11 cases and(15.17± 1.42)months and those in chemotherapy group were(6.87±3.05)months,16 cases and(11.91±1.09)months.The PFS was significantly longer in combined group than that in chemotherapy group(log rank x2=4.377,P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups(log rank x2=3.442,P>0.05).During treatment,the total incidence rate of adverse drug reactions showed no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).After 2 cycles of treatment,the levels of CEA and CY-FRA21-1 in both groups were gradually reduced(P<0.05)while the level of ALB was significantly risen(P<0.05),and the changes of the above indic()s in combined group were significantly higher compared to chemotherapy group(P<0.05).Conclusion:PD-1 immunosuppressant combined with chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced NSCLC,which can significantly inhibit the tumor progression,prolong the PFS,and improve the prognosis.

Advanced NSCLCPD-1 immunosuppressantChemotherapyTumor markersPrognosis

戴婷、查名宝、许林利、童玫瑰、娄悦

展开 >

芜湖市中医医院肿瘤科 安徽芜湖 241000

晚期NSCLC PD-1免疫抑制剂 化疗 肿瘤标志物 预后

安徽省卫生健康委科研项目

2020SEY079

2024

现代生物医学进展
黑龙江省森工总医院 哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院

现代生物医学进展

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.755
ISSN:1673-6273
年,卷(期):2024.24(10)
  • 29