首页|鼻咽癌放射治疗危及器官自动勾画的几何和剂量学分析

鼻咽癌放射治疗危及器官自动勾画的几何和剂量学分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨分析鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗(VMAT)中危及器官(OAR)自动勾画(AS)的几何和剂量学准确度,并检验OAR勾画的几何和剂量学之间的相关性,为放射治疗(简称放疗)患者OAR勾画提供参考依据。方法 回顾性选择120例鼻咽癌放疗患者,其中男性84例,女性36例;年龄11~82岁,中位年龄55岁;病灶位于颅底与软腭之间,垂直径和横径各3~4 cm,前后径2~3 cm。其中随机数字法选择85例患者经AccuLearning深度学习训练平台训练形成AS模型,将AS模型导人AccuContour软件。利用AS模型勾画未训练的35例鼻咽癌放疗患者的18个OAR。比较AS与手动勾画(MS)OAR的几何度量有戴斯相似性系数(DSC)、杰卡德系数(JAC)、质心偏差(DC)、豪斯多夫距离(HD95)、对称位置平均表面距离(ASSD)、相对绝对体积差异(RAVD)。在同一个VMAT计划下,通过剂量体积直方图(DVH),比较AS与MS勾画的OAR剂量学参数。采用双尾Spearman来分析几何指标和剂量学绝对差异值之间的相关性。结果 AS勾画的OAR轮廓与MS勾画的OAR轮廓具有差异性。几何指标DSC、JAC、RAVD勾画质量表现最佳的是下颌骨,其均值±标准差分别为0。94±0。01、0。88±0。02、6。34±4。13。左晶状体的HD95、ASSD结果最好,其均值±标准差分别为2。04± 0。91、0。22±0。12。DC均值±标准差最佳的是右眼球,为0。93±0。77。DSC和JAC中勾画质量表现最差是视交叉,其均值±标准差分别为0。75±0。06、0。60±0。07。DC和HD95中勾画质量最差的OAR是左颞叶,其均值±标准差分别为5。22± 2。30、11。89±3。82。口腔的ASSD均值±标准差表现最差,为1。30±0。41。右晶状体的RAVD均值±标准差表现最差,为29。03±16。51。所有OAR的MS剂量参数均值比AS的低,但AS的剂量值未超过剂量限定条件。配对t检验发现绝大部分OAR的剂量学参数差异无统计学意义,仅脊髓和脑干的剂量参数差异有统计学意义。双尾Spearman相关性检验显示没有OAR的几何指标和剂量绝对差异值(ΔDose)之间呈强相关性。结论 AccuContour AS软件对鼻咽癌放疗勾画OAR轮廓具有一定准确性,这为临床医生提高了工作效率。没有观察到AS几何指标和剂量差异之间的强相关性。
Geometric and dosimetric analysis of automatic segmentation of organs at risk for radiotherapy on nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Objective To analyze the geometric and dosimetric accuracy of automatic segmentation of organs at risk(OAR)in volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and exam the correlation between geometry and dosimetry of OAR delineation,and provide reference for OAR delineation in radiotherapy patients.Methods A total of 120 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively enrolled,which included 84 males and 36 females,aged 11-82 years old with median age of 55 years old.The lesion was located between skull base and soft palate,with vertical diameter and transverse diameter of 3-4 cm,respectively,and anteroposterior diameter was 2-3 cm.A total of 85 patients were se-lected by random number method and trained by AccuLearning deep learning training platform to form AS model,and the AS model was imported into AccuContour software.The AS contouring model was used to automatically delineate 18 OAR in 35 untrained nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy patients.The geometric measurements of AS and manually segmontation(MS)OAR were compared,which included Dice similarity coefficient(DSC),Jacquard coefficient(JAC),deviation of centroid(DC),Hausdorff distance(HD95),average symmetric surface distance(ASSD),and relative absolute volume difference(RAVD).Under the same VMAT plan,the OAR dosimetric parameters delineated by AS and MS were compared by dose volume histogram(DVH).The correlation between geometric index and dosimetry absolute difference was analyzed by double-tailed Spearman.Results The OAR contouring outlined by AS and MS were different.The mandible was the best delineation quali-ty in DSC,JAC and RAVD,of which mean±standard deviation was 0.94±0.01,0.88±0.02 and 6.34±4.13,respectively.The results of HD95 and ASSD of left lens were the best,of which mean±standard deviation was 2.04±0.91 and 0.22± 0.12,respectively.The best mean±standard deviation of DC was 0.93±0.77 in the right eyeball.The worst performance in DSC and JAC was the optic chiasm,of which mean±standard deviation was 0.75±0.06 and 0.60±0.07,respectively.The worst de-lineated OAR in DC and HD95 was the left temporal lobe,of which mean±standard deviation was 5.22±2.30 and 11.89±3.82,respectively.The oral cavity was the worst ASSD,of which mean±standard deviation was 1.30±0.41.The right crystalline lens was the worst RAVD,of which mean±standard deviation was 29.03±16.51.The mean value of MS dose parameters for all OAR was lower than that for AS,but dose value for AS was not exceed the dose limit.The paired t-test showed that there was no signifi-cant difference in dosimetric parameters of the most OAR,but only in pinal cord and brainstem was statistically significant.The two-tailed Spearman correlation test showed that there was the strong correlation between non-OAR geometric parameters and Absolute dose difference(ΔDose).Conclusion It is demonstrated that AccuContour automatic contouring software could contour OAR with certain accuracy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy,which improves the work efficiency for clinicians,and there is no strong correlation between AS geometric index and dose difference.

nasopharyngeal cancerradiotherapyorgans attriskautomatic segmentationgeometric indexdosiology

黄新、王新卓、薛涛、刘双童、刘斌、吴迪、张恒、王辉

展开 >

天津市人民医院 肿瘤诊疗中心,天津 300121

鼻咽癌 放射治疗 危及器官 自动勾画 几何指标 剂量学

天津市重点医学重点学科(专科)建设项目

TJYXZDXK-053B

2024

生物医学工程与临床
天津市生物医学工程学会,天津市第三中心医院

生物医学工程与临床

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.462
ISSN:1009-7090
年,卷(期):2024.28(1)
  • 34