首页|常规超声及UE联合DBT对乳腺肿块良恶性诊断鉴别的准确性分析

常规超声及UE联合DBT对乳腺肿块良恶性诊断鉴别的准确性分析

扫码查看
目的 分析常规超声、超声弹性成像(UE)与数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)联合应用对乳腺肿块的定性诊断价值。方法 选择2022年1月至2023年12月152例乳腺肿块女性患者,年龄22~65岁,平均年龄44。12岁;身体质量指数18~26 kg/m2,平均身体质量指数22。45 kg/m2;肿块位置:左侧100例,右侧52例;肿块直径0。5~4。7cm,平均直径2。33 cm。均行常规超声、UE和DBT检查。以手术病理诊断为金标准,对比常规超声、UE和DBT单独使用与联合应用的定性诊断价值;对比良恶性乳腺肿块患者常规超声参数、UE参数和DBT参数。结果 手术病理诊断显示,152例均为单发性结节患者,共有152个肿块,84个为恶性,68个为良性。常规超声、UE和DBT单独使用对乳腺肿块良恶性的诊断效能对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);联合诊断灵敏度更高(95。24%vs 71。43%、76。19%、73。81%),对比单一诊断差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。恶性乳腺肿块弹性应变率、肿块直径、直径变化率、肿块面积、面积比、边缘清晰占比低于良性(2。92%±0。54%vs 6。06%±1。72%、13。56 mm±3。32 mm vs 19。78 mm±3。72 mm、0。22%±0。05%vs 0。39%±0。12%、8。68 cm2±1。72 cm2 vs16。54 cm2±3。18 cm2、1。21%±0。24%vs 1。92%±0。36%、4。76%vs 73。53%),UE 评分、血流信号等级、边缘模糊、遮蔽、毛刺、肿块结构扭曲、血液运行增加和血管穿入占比明显高于良性,组间差异有显著统计学意义(P<0。01)。结论 常规超声、UE与DBT联合应用,可准确诊断乳腺肿块良恶性,可将影像学征象作为评估依据,有应用价值。
Accuracy analysis of conventional ultrasound and UE combined with DBT in differential diagnosis of benign and ma-lignant breast masses
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of conventional ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography(UE)combined with digital breast tomosynthesis(DBT)in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses.Methods From January 2022 to December 2023,a total of 152 patients with breast mass were enrolled,which aged 22-65 years old with mean age of 44.12 years old;body mass index(BMI)was 18-26 kg/m2 with mean BMI of 22.45 kg/m2.There were 100 cases of mass was located on the left side and 52 on the right side.The tumor diameter was 0.5-4.7 cm with mean diameter of 2.33 cm.All of them performed conventional ultrasound,UE and DBT.The qualitative diagnostic value of conventional ul-trasound,UE and DBT alone and in combination was compared with gold standard of surgical pathological diagnosis.The conventional ultrasound parameters,UE parameters and DBT parameters of patients with benign and malignant breast masses were compared.Results The surgical pathological diagnosis showed that 152 patients were all solitary nodules(among 152 masses,84 were malignant and 68 were benign).There was no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound,UE and DBT single for benign and malignant breast masses(P>0.05),the sensitivity of combined diagnosis was sta-tistically significantly higher than single diagnosis(95.24%vs 71.43%,76.19%,73.81%.P<0.05).The elastic strain rate,mass diameter,diameter change rate,mass area,area ratio,and proportion of marginal sharpness in malignant patients were sig-nificantly lower(2.92%±0.54%vs 6.06%±1.72%,13.56 mm±3.32 mm vs 19.78 mm±3.72 mm,0.22%±0.05%vs 0.39%±0.12%,8.68 cm2±1.72 cm2 vs 16.54 cm2±3.18 cm2,1.21%±0.24%vs 1.92%±0.36%,4.76%vs 73.53%),and the UE score,blood flow signal grade,edge blurring,shielding,burr,mass structure distortion,increased blood supply,and vascular penetration were significantly higher than those in benign patients,and the difference between the groups was statisti-cally significant(P<0.05).Conclusion It is demonstrated that combined application of conventional ultrasound,UE and DBT can accurately diagnose the benign and malignant breast masses,and the imaging signs can be used as the basis of evaluation,which have significant application value.

conventional ultrasoundultrasonic elastographydigital breast tomosynthesisbreast tumorbenign and malignant classificationultrasonic signs

张巨春、薛岩、余影

展开 >

阜阳市妇女儿童医院超声科,安徽阜阳 236000

常规超声 超声弹性成像 数字乳腺断层合成 乳腺肿瘤 良恶性 超声征象

2024

生物医学工程与临床
天津市生物医学工程学会,天津市第三中心医院

生物医学工程与临床

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.462
ISSN:1009-7090
年,卷(期):2024.28(4)