秸秆收储运模式对运输成本的影响
Impact of Straw Collecting,Storage and Transportation Modes on Transportation Costs
田亚超 1李森 2晋强2
作者信息
- 1. 新疆互力佳源环保科技有限公司,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830063
- 2. 新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052
- 折叠
摘要
以乌鲁木齐市为例,选取了 10 个储运点,分析不同秸秆收储运模式的特点,寻找经济可行的收储运模式,提升秸秆生物质的利用率.结果表明:秸秆运输成本占秸秆生物质燃料成本的比例较大;模式一适用于秸秆储存量不大、运输距离较近的收储运点;模式二对距离较远、储量小的收储运点较为适合;模式三适用于储量大的收储运点,收集快,运输距离短.3 种模式各有利弊,应针对不同的地点选用最合适的方法.储量小,选择模式一;储量大,选择模式三;距离远,选择模式二.
Abstract
Taking Urumqi City as an example,10 storage and transportation points were selected to analyze the characteristics of different straw collecting,storage and transportation modes,and to find economically feasible collecting,storage and transportation modes to improve the utilization rate of straw biomass.The results show that the transportation cost of straw accounts for a large proportion of the cost of straw biomass fuel;mode 1 is suitable for collecting,storage,and transportation points with small straw storage capacity and close transportation distance;mode 2 is more suitable for collecting,storage and transportation points that are far away and have small reserves;mode 3 is suitable for storage and transportation points with large reserves,with fast collection and short transportation distance.Each of the three modes has its own advantages and disadvantages,and the most suitable method should be selected for different locations.For low reserve,select mode 1;for large reserves,select mode 3;for long distance,select mode 2.
关键词
生物质秸秆/秸秆收储运/收储运模式/运输成本Key words
biomass straw/straw collecting,storage and transportation/collecting,storage and transportation mode/transportation cost引用本文复制引用
基金项目
新疆互力佳源环保科技有限公司科技项目(HLJY2022KY0530A-01)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据