首页|不同秸秆还田模式下红壤坡耕地产流产沙特征

不同秸秆还田模式下红壤坡耕地产流产沙特征

扫码查看
通过人工模拟降雨试验,研究不同秸秆还田量(0。30、0。45、0。6 0和0。75 kg/m2)和不同还田方式(粉碎覆盖还田(crushed mulch reversion,CV)、粉碎翻耕还田(crushed tillage reversion,RT)、覆盖-粉碎翻耕还田(mulch-crushed tillage reversion,CR))下地表产流产沙变化过程,分析秸秆不同还田方式和不同还田量下地表产流产沙规律及其内在机理。结果表明:1)在相同还田方式下,秸秆还田量对产流时间有显著影响,随着秸秆还田量增加,初始产流时间、产流稳定时间均增加;在相同秸秆还田量下,CV和RT产流时间差异不大,CR推迟产流时间最明显,CR初始产流时间比对照组推迟19。42~55。17 min。2)在相同还田方式下,随着秸秆还田量增加,地表径流初始产流强度、稳定产流强度减小,地表总产流量显著减小,其中RT、CR在0。60 kg/m2与0。75 kg/m2还田量时地表总产流无显著差异;相同秸秆还田量时,CR减流效益显著大于CV、RT,初始径流强度较对照组减少23。64~44。04 mm/h,地表总产流量较对照组减少55。74%~98。92%。3)在相同还田方式下,随着秸秆还田量增加,产沙强度不断减小,地表总产沙显著减小,3种还田方式下还田量在0。60 kg/m2与0。75 kg/m2时地表总产沙无显著差异;相同秸秆还田量下,CR减沙效益大于CV、RT,较对照组减沙效益为93。73%~99。99%。可见,0。60 kg/m2覆盖-粉碎翻耕还田为最佳还田模式。
Runoff and soil erosion characteristics in red soil slope croplands under various straw return modes
through artificial rainfall simulations,the variations in surface runoff and sediment yield under different straw return rates(0.30,0.45,0.60,and 0.75 kg/m2)and methods(crushed mulch reversion(CV),crushed tillage reversion(RT),and mulch-crushed tillage reversion(CR))are investigated,and the underlying mechanisms governing surface runoff and sediment yield patterns under different straw return methods and rates are analyzed.The results indicate that:1)Under the same return method,straw return rates significantly affect the timing of runoff production,with increasing straw return rates leading to longer initial and stable runoff production time.Among the same straw return rates,there is minimal difference in runoff production time between CV and RT,while CR exhibits the most pronounced delay,with an initial runoff production time delayed by 19.42 to 55.17 minutes compared to CK.2)With increasing straw return rates under the same return method,the initial and stable surface runoff intensities decrease,resulting in a significant reduction in total surface runoff.Notably,there is no significant difference in total surface runoff between RT and CR at straw return rates of 0.60 kg/m2 and 0.75 kg/m2.Moreover,under the same straw return rate,CR demonstrates significantly greater flow reduction benefits compared to CV and RT,with a decrease in initial runoff intensity ranging from 23.64 to 44.04 mm/h,and a reduction in total surface runoff ranging from 55.74% to 98.92% compared to CK.3)Under the same return method,increasing straw return rates lead to a continual decrease in sediment yield intensity,resulting in a significant reduction in total surface sediment yield.There is no significant difference in total surface sediment yield among the three return methods at straw return rates of 0.60 kg/m2 and 0.75 kg/m2.Additionally,under the same straw return rate,CR demonstrates greater sediment reduction benefits compared to CV and RT,with sediment reduction benefits ranging from 93.73% to 99.99% compared to CK.Thus,it is evident that mulch-crushed tillage reversion(CR)with a straw return rate of 0.60 kg/m2 is the optimal straw return mode.

red soil slope croplandartificial rainfall simulationstraw returnrunoffsediment yield

杜勇强、常婷婷、陈晓安、王策

展开 >

江西省水利科学院江西省土壤侵蚀与防治重点实验室,江西南昌 330029

河海大学农业科学与工程学院,江苏南京 210098

固原市水利水电勘测设计研究院有限公司,宁夏固原 756000

江西省鄱阳湖流域生态水利技术创新中心,江西南昌 330029

展开 >

红壤坡耕地 人工模拟降雨 秸秆还田 产流 产沙

江西省重点研发计划项目江西省水利厅科技项目江西省技术创新引导类计划项目

20203BBGL73226202224ZDKT1220212AEI91011

2024

陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)
陕西师范大学

陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.563
ISSN:1672-4291
年,卷(期):2024.52(4)