From the perspective of academic history,classical path and historical path are the two most important paths in the study of ZUOZHUAN in the Song Dynasty.Under the influence of skepticism about classics,scholars raised doubts about the identity of the author and formation era of the book;criticizing the"example"of Du Yu's interpretation of the book,especially the ridiculous theory of"according to reporting",the scholars reformed the parts which did not match to the Confucian teachings.This path lowered the status of the book in Confucian Classics,so it was valued as a historic book.Some scholars viewed the ZUOZHUAN as a historical book,affirming its influence as a model for the compilation of chronological historical books in the Song Dynasty.The adaptation of ZUOZHUAN promoted the compilation of historical books in the Song Dynasty,and the scholars paid attention to the historical value in the ZUOZHUAN,and examined the overall trend and institutional evolution during the Spring and Autumn period.The skepticism and criticism of the traditional theories in the study of ZUOZHUAN in the Song Dynasty provides new research paths.At the same time,with the decline of the status of the ZUOZHUAN in Classics,its historical value has been further explored.
关键词
宋代/《左传》学/经与史/二重路径
Key words
the Song Dynasty/the study of ZUOZHUAN/classics and historiography/two paths