首页|"起承转合"与"正反合"的比较

"起承转合"与"正反合"的比较

扫码查看
"起承转合"是中国传统的章法学术语,而"正反合"是德国古典哲学的概念.前者是文法形式,后者是思想形式.两者在具体的运用过程中,都试图不断地提高其普遍性的价值,但也都遭遇到不同的质疑和批判.对两者进行比较,进而发现其共同的问题,从而在理论思考方面有所推进,这是非常必要的.无论是"起承转合"还是"正反合",都是人类特定认识阶段的思想总结的产物.它们作为一种"形式"的局限性本源于人类自身的局限性,也因此,我们讲论"形式"的时候,总是遭遇有限性的问题.与此同时,它们之间也并没有向对方过渡或转化的态势,这种现象耐人寻味.
Comparison of"Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He"and"Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis"
"Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He"is a traditional Chinese terminology term,while"Thesis-Antithesis-Syn-thesis"is a concept of German classical philosophy.The former is a grammatical form and the latter is a form of thought.In the concrete process of application,the two concepts try to continuously improve the value of their universality.However,they have also encountered different doubts and criticisms.It is nec-essary to compare the two concepts and discover their common problems to advance theoretical thinking.Whether it is"Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He"or"Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis",they are the products of the sum-mary of thoughts at a specific stage of human cognition.Their limitations as"forms"originate from the lim-itations of human beings themselves.Therefore,when we talk about"form",we always encounter the problem of limitation.At the same time,there is no transition or transformation between them,which is in-triguing.

"Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He""Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis"Dialecticscomparisonform

田义勇

展开 >

浙大城市学院 人文学院,浙江 杭州 310015

起承转合 正反合 辩证法 比较 形式

2024

绍兴文理学院学报
绍兴文理学院

绍兴文理学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.267
ISSN:1008-293X
年,卷(期):2024.44(5)