首页|《三国演义》毛评对李评的互文手法

《三国演义》毛评对李评的互文手法

The Intertextual Approach of Mao's Comments to Li's Comments on Romance of the Three Kingdoms

扫码查看
《三国演义》李评对毛评的论点阐发有着重要的启发作用,毛评在吸纳李评的同时,还对其进行了深入探讨与观点批驳.从互文性理论来看,两评之间存在典型的互文性关系.作为后文本的毛评,对其前辈评本的互文手法主要包括三种:一是复制与挪用;二是改写与拓展;三是对话与反驳.正是在这些互文手法的运用下,毛评或正或反地从李评身上汲取了充足的评点养分,从而熔铸自身的血肉,推动了《三国演义》的经典化进程.总之,李评为毛评提供了可供借鉴的评点范例,而毛评则在继承、发展与批驳李评的同时,又间接对李评进行了阐释与解读.
Li's comments of Romance of the Three Kingdoms have an extremely important enlightening role in elucidating the arguments of Mao's comments.Mao's comments not only absorbed Li's comments,but also conducted in-depth explorations and refutations of his viewpoints.From the perspective of intertextuali-ty theory,there is a typical intertextual relationship between the two reviews.As the post text of Mao's comments,there are mainly three intertextual techniques for its predecessor's review:first,copying and misappropriating;Second,rewriting and expanding;Third,dialogue and refutation.It was the use of these intertextual techniques that Mao's comments either positively or negatively drew sufficient commentary nu-trients from Li's comments,thus melting its own flesh and blood and promoting the canonization process of The Romance of the Three Kingdoms.In short,Li's comments provided Mao's comments with a reference example for comments;on the other hand,Mao's comments indirectly explained and interpreted Li's comments while inheriting,developing,and criticizing them.

intertextual approachcopying and misappropriatingrewriting and expandingdialogue and refutation

黎昇鑫

展开 >

南开大学 文学院,天津 300071

互文手法 复制与挪用 改写与拓展 对话与反驳

2024

绍兴文理学院学报
绍兴文理学院

绍兴文理学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.267
ISSN:1008-293X
年,卷(期):2024.44(7)