首页|秦简"中县道"与秦代京畿行政体制

秦简"中县道"与秦代京畿行政体制

扫码查看
秦简"中县道"可在内史、属邦、郡三大郡级行政区的框架下进行解读.在法律文本及行政运作中,"中县"可以独立,是一种郡级行政区,当属内史统辖.由此"中县道"应断读为"中县、道",是"中县"与"中道"的统称.岳麓秦简"属邦道"与"中县"等郡区相应,应是属邦统辖的郡级行政区."中道"与"属邦道"同在秦旧地,与"中县"相对应,又非"郡县道"之"道",说明属邦统辖的"属邦道"即是"中道".因此,秦代京畿地区"中县道"实为内史与属邦双重管辖的行政体制.这种体制既延续着秦统一前的王畿行政体制,又奠定了汉初京畿行政一体化的基础.
"Zhongxian Dao"in the Qin Bamboo Slips and the Administrative System of the Capital of Qin
In the Qin bamboo slips,the term"Zhongxian Dao"warrants a further interpretation within the framework of three major administrative districts of the county level:Neishi,Shubang,and Jun.In legal documents and the administrative operations,"Zhongxian"can operate independently as a county-level administrative district under the jurisdiction of Neishi.Therefore,"Zhongxian Dao"should be read as"Zhongxian"and"Dao".It is a general term for both"Zhongxian"and"Zhongdao".The Qin bamboo slips collected by Yuelu Academy,which encompass"Shubang Dao"and"Zhongxian",align with county regions and are inferred to be county-level administrative districts under the jurisdiction of vassal states.Both"Zhongdao"and"Shubang Dao"found their place in the former Qin territory,corresponding to"Zhongxian",yet they differed from"Dao"in"Junxian Dao",signifying that"Shubang Dao"under the jurisdiction of vassal states was"Zhongdao".Thus,"Zhongxian Dao"in the capital region of Qin operated as an administrative system under the dual governance of Neishi and vassal states.This structure not only continued the administrative framework of the former royal capital before the unification of Qin but also laid the groundwork for the administrative integration of the capital region in the early Han dynasty.

Qin DynastyCapital RegionZhongxian DaoNeishiVassal States

吴方基

展开 >

嘉应学院政法学院,广东,梅州,514015

秦朝 京畿地区 中县道 内史 属邦

国家社会科学基金后期资助项目教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目

22FZSB01421YJA770012

2024

史学月刊
河南大学,河南省历史学会

史学月刊

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.376
ISSN:0583-0214
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 5