首页|微观史学以小见大的逻辑差异——兼谈与其他史学路径的关系

微观史学以小见大的逻辑差异——兼谈与其他史学路径的关系

扫码查看
以小见大是微观史学的特色.其合理性历经学界的误解和质疑,逐渐被认可.可是,由于当前研究往往就少量微观史作品谈其共性,尚未辨明其以小见大的逻辑差异,因此对微观史学的概念理解仍显模糊,与之相关的各种理论争议也没有被澄清.基于对20余项微观史作品的以小见大逻辑剖析,可以分辨出"单子同构""结构细化""符号阐释"和"例外反推"四种类型.识别以上差异,有助于更精准地厘清微观史学与"全球微观史""碎片化""后现代主义"和"新文化史"的关系.全球微观史关注大空间跨度的文化反差,使个案极具代表性.这不能解决乡村主题微观史的论证可靠性问题,但证明关注冲突是以小见大的最合理思路;所谓"碎片化"的研究必不涉及宏观历史的思考,微观史学能提供更新历史共识的"反例",有以小见大的意义,可避免成为"碎片";后现代主义主张放弃整体史观,不抵制虚构,微观史作品则均致力于以小见大,也言出有据,存疑明确,与后现代无关;新文化史关注文化挪用,与大多数微观史类型有论证逻辑的差别,只有"例外反推型"与之契合.明确微观史学的逻辑差异,可以为澄清多重理论误解提供直观参照.
The Logic Differences of"Seeing Big Things Through Small Ones"in Microhistory and Its Relationship with Other Historical Approaches
"Seeing big things through small ones"is the characteristic of microhistory.Its rationality has undergone the misunderstanding and questioning of academic circle and gradually been recognized.However,the current researches often discuss the commonality of a small number of micro historical works,and have not yet identified the logical differences of"seeing big things through small ones"in these works,thus their conceptual understanding of microhistory is still vague,and various theoretical disputes related to it have not been clarified.Based on the logical analysis of"seeing big things through small ones"in more than 20 microhistory works,one could identify four types:monad isomorphism,multicomponent structuralism,symbol interpretivism and reasoning backward by exception.Identifying the above differences will help clarify the relationship between microhistory and"global microhistory","fragmentation","postmodernism"and"new cultural history"more precisely.Global microhistory focuses on cultural contrasts in large spatial spans,making individual cases extremely representative.It could not resolve the problem of the demonstration reliability of the microhistory of rural theme,but it proves that paying attention to the conflict is the most reasonable way of"seeing big things through small ones".The so-called"fragmentation"research does not involve macro historical thinking,while microhistory can provide"counterexamples"to update historical consensus,which has the significance of"seeing big things through small ones"and could avoid becoming"fragment".Postmodernism advocates giving up the overall view of history,does not resist fiction,but all of the microhistory works are committed to"seeing big things through small ones",arguing on evidence and clarifying doubts.So microhistory has nothing to do with postmodernism.The new cultural history is concerned with cultural appropriation,which is different from most types of microhistory in argumentation logic,only the logical type of"reasoning backward by exception"is in accord with it.Identifying the logical differences of microhistory can provide an unambiguous reference for clarifying multiple theoretical misinterpretations.

Microhistory"Seeing Big Things Through Small Ones"Global MicrohistoryFragmentationPostmodernismNew Cultural History

李根

展开 >

东北师范大学历史文化学院,东北,长春,130024

微观史学 以小见大 全球微观史 碎片化 后现代主义 新文化史

国家社会科学基金一般项目

18BSS005

2024

史学月刊
河南大学,河南省历史学会

史学月刊

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.376
ISSN:0583-0214
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 4