从奥姆斯特德案看美国早期宪制的运行
The Operation of Constitutionalism in Early America in the View of the Olmstead Case
林斌1
作者信息
- 1. 安徽师范大学历史学院 安徽,芜湖,241002
- 折叠
摘要
奥姆斯特德案肇始于美国革命时期,前后持续三十余年.该案表明,在美国早期宪制舞台上,最高法院只是多种政治角逐力量之一,其权威相当有限,不能单方面最终决定宪法问题.各州还享有一定的宪法话语权,可以自主参与解决宪法争议,并拒绝承认最高法院的判决拥有最高权威和约束性.奥姆斯特德案为我们近距离观察美国早期宪制的实际运行机制提供了一个新颖的视点.
Abstract
The Olmsted case began during the American Revolution and lasted for more than 30 years.The case showed that the Supreme Court was only one of the players in the constitutional arena,its authority was fairly limited,and it could not unilaterally decide the final constitutional question.There were also certain constitutional reasons for states to participate in the resolution of constitutional disputes on their own,and refuse to recognize the Supreme Court's decisions as supreme authority and binding.The Olmsted case provides a novel viewpoint for us to observe the actual operation mechanism of the constitutional system in the early days of the United States.
关键词
奥姆斯特德案/最高法院/宪制/美国早期国家/州权Key words
The Olmstead Case/Supreme Court/Constitutionalism/Early American State/State Rights引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据