首页|症状性心肌桥冠状动脉定量血流分数与核素心肌灌注显像的相关性分析

症状性心肌桥冠状动脉定量血流分数与核素心肌灌注显像的相关性分析

扫码查看
目的 分析症状性心肌桥(SMB)患者冠状动脉定量血流分数(QFR)与核素心肌灌注显像的相关性,探讨QFR在评估冠状动脉心肌桥引起心肌灌注缺血方面的临床意义。方法 连续入组2020年9月至2023年6月因胸痛、胸闷等心肌缺血症状经冠状动脉造影确诊为前降支(LAD)SMB共203例(男性97例,女性106例),应用QFR分析软件对肌桥直径压缩狭窄程度进行定量测量后按Noble分级,分为Noble 1级组(126例)、Noble 2级组(25例)、Noble 3级组(52例);应用三维定量冠状动脉造影分析肌桥段收缩期(SG-QFR)、舒张期(DG-QFR)肌桥段区域心肌供血灌注情况,住院期间行核素心肌灌注显像检查。结果 Noble 1、2及3级3组一般临床特征上仅在肌桥伴有病变方面差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);3组间DG-QFR分别为 0。94±0。06、0。90±0。08、0。79±0。10(P=0。023);SG-QFR 分别为 0。89±0。08、0。76±0。09、0。71±0。07(P=0。045);核素负荷试验灌注缺损分别为18%、20%、60%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。核素负荷心肌核素灌注缺损与DG-QFR、SG-QFR相关性分析显示r分别为-0。55,-0。54(P<0。01)呈负相关。结论 受到肌桥对心脏收缩和舒张活动的动态影响,D-QFR更能反映冠状动脉心肌桥对心肌缺血的影响,但仅提示和心肌灌注显像阳性间存在中等强度的负相关。
Correlation analysis between quantitative coronary flow fraction and myocardial perfusion imaging in symptomatic myocardial bridge
Objective To compare and analyze the correlation between the quantitative flow rate(QFR)of coronary artery and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with symptomatic myocardial bridge(SMB),and explore the clinical significance of QFR in evaluating myocardial ischemia caused by coronary myocardial bridging.Methods A total of 203 patients(97 males and 106 females)with left anterior descending artery(LAD)SMB diagnosed by coronary angiography due to myocardial ischemia symptoms such as chest pain and tightness were enrolled consecutively from September 2020 to June 2023.QFR analysis software was used to quantitatively measure the degree of compression stenosis of the SMB diameter,and they were divided into Noble level 1 group(n=126),Noble level 2 group(n=25),and Noble level 3 group(n=52)according to Noble grading.Quantitative coronary angiography(QCA)was used to analyze the myocardial blood supply and perfusion in the SMB region during the systolic phases(SG-QFR)and diastolic phases(DG-QFR)of the SMB segment.Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging was performed during hospitalization.Results The general clinical characteristics of Noble 1,2,and 3 groups showed differences only in the presence of SMB lesions(P<0.05).The DG-QFR of Noble 1,2,and 3 groups were 0.94±0.06,0.90±0.08,and 0.79±0.10(P=0.023),respectively.The SG-QFR values were 0.89±0.08,0.76±0.09,and 0.71±0.07,respectively(P=0.045).The perfusion defects in the nuclide load test were 18%,20%,and 60%,respectively,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The correlation analysis between nuclide-loaded myocardial nuclide perfusion defect and DG-QFR,SG-QFR showed a negative correlation[r=-0.55,-0.54(P<0.01)].Conclusion D-QFR can better reflect the impact of SMB on myocardial ischemia under the dynamic influence of myocardial bridge on cardiac contraction,however,it only indicates a moderate negative correlation with positive myocardial perfusion imaging.

Myocardial bridgingCoronary angiographyMyocardial perfusion imagingQuantitative flow ratio

雷警输、王立娜、李胜朝

展开 >

065201 廊坊,河北医科大学附属河北燕达医院心内科

心肌桥 冠状血管造影术 心肌灌注显像 定量血流分数

河北省廊坊市科技计划

2020013118

2024

山西医药杂志
山西医药卫生传媒集团有限责任公司

山西医药杂志

影响因子:0.504
ISSN:0253-9926
年,卷(期):2024.53(6)
  • 15