首页|"依口代笔"与"依稿代笔":清代清水江契约的代笔方式

"依口代笔"与"依稿代笔":清代清水江契约的代笔方式

扫码查看
传统契约文书的研究随新材料的大量刊布而不断发展,但契约研究的一个基础性问题,即这些契约是如何制作的,尚缺乏充分讨论.在多数契约均为"代笔"的情况下,上述问题的重点在于考察契约的代笔方式为何.就此,清水江契约中的"依口代笔"与"依稿代笔"可以成为分析的关键:相较于旧说,前者并非指"依口录词",而应被理解为"依议写契";后者亦非"照词抄誊",而是指依契约议定而完成草稿誊正.据此,代笔写契的性质不应是"听写"或"誊写/抄写",而是具备主体表达可能的"书写",代笔人的角色因而也远非"打字员"而已.在此意义上,契约并非完全是"记录",而有可能是被"书写"的,关于其性质的理解或应从事实记载转变为一种"说法"或"叙述".
Drafting Contracts by Scribes:A Study on the Scribal Writing of Contracts in the Qingshui River Region in Qing Dynasty
The research of traditional Chinese contracts has developed along with the availability of new source materials.However,a fundamental question remains largely unaddressed,namely how these contracts,particularly those prepared by scribes,were produced?This study focuses on the a-nalysis of two expressions used to describe the activities of contractual scribes,namely,"transcription by oral statements"and"transcription by drafts"as found in the contract from the Qingshui River manuscripts.It is argued that the former does not merely denote"dictation"by the scribes based on the contractor's oral statement,nor does the latter refer to a simple"transcription"of a pre-provid-ed draft.Instead,this study suggests that the role of scribes in contract production should be under-stood as a form of"writing",allowing for the integration of their subjective expression.In this sense,the nature of contracts should not be viewed simply as a"record"of facts but rather as a fact-based"statement"or"narrative".

contractsscribesthe Qingshui River manuscriptswriting

瞿见

展开 >

中国农业大学人文与发展学院

中国法治现代化研究院(北京,100083)

契约 代笔 清水江文书 书写

2024

思想战线
云南大学

思想战线

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.803
ISSN:1001-778X
年,卷(期):2024.50(1)
  • 12