环境修复责任司法裁判中行政主体的配合义务
On the Cooperation Obligation of Administrative Subject in the Judicial Adjudication of Environmental Restoration Responsibility
徐欢忠 1徐本鑫2
作者信息
- 1. 南京师范大学 法学院,江苏 南京 210023
- 2. 安徽师范大学 法学院,安徽 芜湖 241000
- 折叠
摘要
为应对环境司法在证据获取、事实认定和判决执行等方面面临的挑战,我国司法制度要求环境行政主体在环境修复责任司法裁判以及判决执行过程中配合司法机关,并形成直接判决式、自愿承担式、征求意见式和参与协商式等多种实践模式.要求环境行政主体在环境修复责任司法裁判中承担一定的配合义务,既有正当性和必要性,又具有一定的规范支撑,但也存在环境行政主体配合义务缺乏明确法律依据和实现过程受阻等问题.鉴于此,有必要合理改善制度设计,从实体和程序两方面对此问题进行妥当安排,以避免因错误处理环境行政权与司法权的关系而引发理论误读与实践错乱.
Abstract
In order to cope with the challenges faced by environmental justice in evidence acquisition,fact determination and judgment execution,China's judicial system requires environmental administrative subjects to cooperate with judicial organs in the process of ju-dicial judgment and judgment execution of environmental restoration responsibility,which forms a variety of practical modes such as di-rect judgment mode,voluntary assumption mode,consultation mode and participation negotiation mode.It is both legitimate and neces-sary to require the environmental administrative subject to undertake certain cooperation obligations in the judicial adjudication of envi-ronmental restoration responsibility,and it also has certain normative support.However,there are also problems such as the lack of clear legal basis for the cooperation obligations of environmental administrative subjects and the obstruction of the implementation process.It is necessary to properly arrange this issue from both substantive and procedural aspects in the system design,so as to avoid theoretical misunderstanding and practical confusion caused by the wrong handling of the relationship between environmental administra-tive power and judicial power.
关键词
环境损害/环境修复/环境司法/行政主体/配合义务Key words
environmental damage/environmental remediation/environmental judicature/administrative subject/cooperation obliga-tion引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学基金一般项目(20BFX076)
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
维普
万方数据