首页|恶意爬取数据行为的刑法规制边界——以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪为视角

恶意爬取数据行为的刑法规制边界——以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪为视角

扫码查看
爬取数据行为的刑事风险逐渐扩张,根本原因在于未厘清非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪法益的实质内涵.考虑到作为本罪行为对象的"数据"所具有的动态流转功能及其背后的重要利益价值,应将本罪保护的法益界定为"数据的控制与操作自由—传统信息内容安全".这一阶层式法益成功跨越事实和规范之间的"鸿沟",保证了刑法罪名体系之间的协调与功能上的合理配置.在厘清非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪法益内涵的基础上,能够为恶意爬取数据的行为划定合理的刑法边界.爬取开放数据一律不构罪;恶意爬取半开放数据不构成本罪,但不排除构成传统信息类犯罪的可能性;恶意爬取不开放数据,若其无法被还原为刑法类型化保护的传统信息,则不构罪;如果能够被还原,根据刑法类型化保护的信息内容是否公开再次判断,若公开则不构罪,反之则构罪,并且可能与传统信息类犯罪发生法条竞合.
Criminal Law Regulatory Boundaries for Malicious Data Crawling:From the Perspective of the Crime of Illegally Obtaining Computer Information System Data
The criminal risk of web crawler is gradually expanding.The fundamental reason is that the essence of the legal interest of the crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data has not been clarified.Considering the dynamic circulation function of"data"as the object of this crime and the important interest value of it,the legal interest protected by this crime should be defined as"freedom of data control and operation-security of traditional information content".This hierarchical legal interest successfully crosses the"gap"between facts and norms,ensuring the coordination and rational allocation of functions between the criminal law accusation systems.On the basis of clarifying the legal connotation of the crime of illegally obtaining computer information system data,a reasona-ble criminal law boundary can be defined for the act of maliciously crawling data.Crawling open data is not a crime.Crawling semi-open data maliciously does not constitute this crime,however,it does not exclude the possibility of constituting traditional information crimes.Crawling unopened data maliciously,if it cannot be restored to traditional information protected by criminal law,does not con-stitute a crime;if it can be restored,it will be judged again based on whether the information content protected by criminal law is pub-licly available.If it is publicly available,it will not constitute a crime,conversely,it will,and the overlap of articles of law may occur between it and traditional information crimes.

web crawlercrime of illegally obtaining computer information system datalegal interestcriminal law boundary

曹岚欣

展开 >

中国政法大学 刑事司法学院,北京 100088

网络爬虫 非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪 法益 刑法边界

中国政法大学硕士研究生创新实践项目

2021SSCX20210053

2024

中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)
中国石油大学

中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.515
ISSN:1673-5595
年,卷(期):2024.40(2)
  • 27