中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.40Issue(4) :104-110.DOI:10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2024.04.0012

宋代隐逸观的调和与演变

The Reconciliation and Evolution of Reclusion in the Song Dynasty

张帆帆
中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)2024,Vol.40Issue(4) :104-110.DOI:10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2024.04.0012

宋代隐逸观的调和与演变

The Reconciliation and Evolution of Reclusion in the Song Dynasty

张帆帆1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 青岛大学 国际教育学院,山东 青岛 266071
  • 折叠

摘要

宋代隐逸名目繁多,隐逸形式多样.宋代隐逸观的冲突,主要在"小隐"和"大隐"间展开.而二者争论的焦点,主要集中在隐居形式和隐居目的两个方面.二者争论的过程中,调和求中的"中隐"观大肆发展."中隐",最初是指一种兼得仕隐佳趣的隐逸方式,宋人则将其发展成一种形而上的具有普遍指导意义的行为准则即"道隐"."道隐"观的出现,与宋代理学的兴盛以及儒、释、道三教合一的发展趋势有关.对"道"的重视,使得宋人论"隐"时从"形隐"向"心隐"过渡的痕迹明显.宋人讲"心隐"时,多追求适性之乐,"孔颜乐处""曾点气象"等内圣之学遂成为隐者的致力方向.

Abstract

Yin or reclusion in the Song Dynasty is entitled with diverse names and takes on various forms.The conflict mainly lies in Xiaoyin(quasi-reclusion)and Dayin(ultra-reclusion),with the focus on two dimensions of form and purpose.In the course of the de-bate there arises Zhongyin(semi-reclusion),which aims to reconcile and harmonize the two conflicting views.Initially the concept of Zhongyin referred to a kind of reclusion as an official,which was later developed into a metaphysical code of conduct of universal guid-ance of Daoyin(Taoist reclusion).The emergence of Daoyin is related with the flourishing Neo-Confucianism and integration of Confu-cianism,Buddhism and Taoism.Emphasis on Tao leaves a trace on transition from Xingyin(bodily reclusion)to Xinyin(spiritual re-clusion)among the Song people,who pursued internal sageliness with commitment to spiritual cultivation.

关键词

宋代/大隐/小隐/中隐/道隐

Key words

the Song Dynasty/Dayin(ultra-reclusion)/Xiaoyin(quasi-reclusion)/Zhongyin(semi-reclusion)/Daoyin(Taoist re-clusion)

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

山东省社会科学规划重点项目(20BHBJ05)

青岛大学社会科学基金项目(RZ2100004829)

出版年

2024
中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)
中国石油大学

中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.515
ISSN:1673-5595
参考文献量1
段落导航相关论文