首页|破解中国式现代化进程中的ESG评级之惑:分歧表征、差异成因及治理逻辑

破解中国式现代化进程中的ESG评级之惑:分歧表征、差异成因及治理逻辑

扫码查看
兼具环境友好、社会责任共担的ESG评级,构成了以中国式现代化理念推进实体经济可持续发展的重要内容.然而,很多评级机构的ESG评级结果或形式存在差异,呈现出ESG评级分歧现象,尤其在国内评级机构、非专职型评级机构之间分歧更加明显.同时,该分歧具有典型的时空特征,在不同的时间、地区、行业间具有显著差异.这些差异的形成与ESG评级涉及多主体、多维度有关,结合标准制定、披露要求、数据披露、数据采集、评分评级五个ESG评级环节,可将差异形成的原因归结为理念维、数据维、技术维三个方面.基于此,对于ESG评级分歧的治理应从ESG全局出发,结合信息生态系统理论,明确信息人、信息本体、信息技术和信息环境四个治理要素,遵循人本观、互动观、系统观和平衡观引领下的ESG评级分歧治理逻辑,为提升ESG评级的决策价值、实现ESG评级体系与中国情境有机结合、推动中国式现代化的拓展与发展提供理论支撑.
Crack the Confusion of ESG Ratings in the Chinese Path to Modernisation:Divergent Representations,Causes of Variation and Governance Logic
The ESG rating,which is environmentally friendly and socially responsible,constitutes an important part of promoting the sustainable development of the real economy with the concept of Chinese path to modernization.However,many rating agencies pursue differences in ESG rating results or forms,presenting the phenomenon of ESG rating divergence.In particular,the divergence is more obvious among domestic rating agencies and non-specialist rating agencies.At the same time,the divergence has typical spatial and temporal characteristics,with significant differences between different times,regions,and industries.And these differences are related to the fact that ESG rating formation involves multiple subjects and dimensions.Combined with the five ESG rating links of standard setting,disclosure requirements,data disclosure,data collection,and scoring and rating,the reasons can be attributed to the concep-tual dimension,data dimension,and technical dimension.Based on this,the governance of ESG rating divergence should be based on the overall situation,which can utilize the information ecosystem theory to clarify the four governance elements of information person,information ontology,information technology and information environment,and follow the logic of ESG rating divergence governance un-der the guidance of humanism,interaction,system and balance.It provides theoretical support for enhancing the decision-making value of ESG ratings,realizing the organic combination of ESG rating system and Chinese context,and promoting the expansion and develop-ment of the Chinese path to modernisation.

Chinese path to modernizationESG rating divergenceinformation ecosystemgovernance logic

王垒、李宽、丁黎黎

展开 >

中国海洋大学 经济学院,山东 青岛 266100

中国式现代化 ESG评级分歧 信息生态系统 治理逻辑

2024

中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)
中国石油大学

中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.515
ISSN:1673-5595
年,卷(期):2024.40(6)