首页|产科无痛分娩与常规分娩的临床疗效比较

产科无痛分娩与常规分娩的临床疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨产妇采用无痛分娩的效果。方法 选取100例分娩的产妇为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组50例。对照组应用常规阴道分娩方式,研究组应用产科无痛分娩方式,比较两组产程时间、产后出血量、新生儿Apgar评分及产妇分娩方式。结果 研究组第一产程、第二产程、第三产程及总产程时间均短于对照组(P<0。05);研究组产后2 h、24 h出血量均少于对照组(P<0。05);新生儿出生后1 min、5 min,研究组新生儿Apgar评分均高于对照组(P<0。05);研究组自然分娩率高于对照组(P<0。05)。结论 分娩产妇采用产科无痛分娩方式可明显缩短产妇产程时间,减少产后出血量,提高新生儿出生后Apgar评分及自然分娩率,值得临床推广与应用。
Comparison of clinical efficacy between obstetric painless delivery and conventional delivery
Objective To explore the effect of painless delivery in parturients.Methods A total of 100 cases of parturient women were selected as research objects and divided into study group and control group according to random number table method,with 50 cases in each group.Conventional vaginal delivery was used in the control group,and painless delivery was used in the study group.The duration of labor,postpartum blood loss,neonatal Apgar score and delivery mode were compared between the two groups.Results The first stage of labor,the second stage of labor,the third stage of labor and the total stage of labor in the study group were shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05).The postpartum blood loss of the study group was lower than that of the control group at 2h and 24h(P<0.05).Apgar scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group lmin and 5min after birth(P<0.05).The rate of natural childbirth in the study group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Obstetric painless delivery can shorten labor time,reduce postpartum bleeding,increase Apgar score and natural delivery rate of newborns,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Parturient womenPainless deliveryApplication effect

陈媚珊

展开 >

潮州市妇幼保健院 妇产科,广东 潮州 521000

产妇 无痛分娩 应用效果

潮州市卫生健康局科研项目

2022039

2024

实用妇科内分泌电子杂志

实用妇科内分泌电子杂志

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.11(4)
  • 10