Comparison of clinical effects between hysteroscopic electrocautery and hysteroscopic curettage in the treatment of endometrial polyps with abnormal uterine bleeding
Objective To explore the clinical effects of hysteroscopic electrocautery and hysteroscopic curettage in the treatment of endometrial polyps with abnormal uterine bleeding.Methods 80 patients with endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into two groups using a random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The research group underwent hysteroscopic electrocautery for treatment,while the control group underwent hysteroscopic curettage for treatment.Compare the general treatment situation,endometrial thickness,serum factor levels,and complications between the two groups.Results The study group had shorter surgical time,perioperative hospitalization time,and postoperative menstrual recovery time compared to the control group.The intraoperative bleeding was less than that of the control group,the endometrial thickness was less than that of the control group,and the serum VEGF level was lower than that of the control group,with statistical significance(P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups of patients(P＞0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of endometrial polyps with abnormal uterine bleeding,compared with hysteroscopic curettage,hysteroscopic electrocautery has advantages such as less trauma,faster postoperative recovery,and better recovery effect,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Endometrial polypsAbnormal uterine bleedingHysteroscopyElectroresectionCurettage and curettage
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
