Comparison of clinical effects of combined lumbo-epidural anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia for cesarean section
Objective To compare the clinical effects of combined lumbo-epidural anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.Methods 330 pregnant women with cesarean section were selected and divided into study group and control group according to random number table method,165 cases in each group.The control group received continuous epidural anesthesia,and the study group received lumbo-epidural anesthesia.The anesthetic effect of the two groups was compared.Results The onset time of anesthesia,complete block time and cesarean section time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group,the dosage of anesthesia drugs and the amount of intraoperative infusion were lower than those of the control group,the level of intraoperative mean arterial pressure(MAP)was higher than that of the control group,and the level of surgical center rate(HR)was lower than that of the control group(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in Apgar score at 5 min after birth between the two groups(P＞0.05).The complication rate of 4.24％in the study group was lower than 12.73％in the control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Lumbo-epidural anesthesia should be given to pregnant women during cesarean section,which can be used as the preferred anesthesia method in cesarean section operation.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
