首页|肝硬化合并急性胆囊炎患者手术风险评估

肝硬化合并急性胆囊炎患者手术风险评估

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同胆囊炎严重程度分级和不同终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝硬化合并急性胆囊炎(AC)患者手术风险。方法 2021 年2 月~2022 年 12 月我院诊治的 92 例肝硬化合并AC患者,均行腹腔镜下胆囊切除手术(LC)治疗。术前采用《东京指南(2018 年)》评估胆囊炎严重程度,其中Ⅰ级55 例,Ⅱ级/Ⅲ级37 例。常规计算MELD评分,其中低危组64 例,中高危组28 例。应用Logistic回归分析影响手术风险的因素。结果 各组中转开腹率比较,差异无显著性统计学意义(P>0。05);Ⅱ级/Ⅲ级患者手术时间为(88。8±11。8)min,显著长于Ⅰ级患者[(77。1±10。4)min,P<0。05],术中出血量和腹腔引流量分别为(91。4±18。7)mL和(339。7±40。7)mL,显著大于Ⅰ级患者[分别为(79。5±12。2)mL和(285。9±36。4)mL,P<0。05],而低危与中高危MELD评分患者手术指标比较,无显著性差异(P>0。05);Ⅱ级/Ⅲ级患者术后感染、出血和胆漏等并发症发生率为27。0%,显著高于Ⅰ级患者的7。3%(P<0。05),中高危MELD患者术后并发症发生率为28。6%,显著高于低危患者的9。4%(P<0。05);以中转开腹以及术后发生并发症为手术风险组(n=18),结果风险组胆囊炎Ⅱ级/Ⅲ级和MELD评分为中高危比例分别为 61。1%和 55。6%,显著高于非风险组的 35。1%和 24。3%(P<0。05);Logistic多因素回归分析显示胆囊炎Ⅱ级/Ⅲ级和MELD评分为中高危是肝硬化合并AC患者LC手术高风险的独立危险因素(P<0。05)。结论 术前评估胆囊炎严重程度分级和MELD评分可以帮助临床医生评估LC手术治疗肝硬化合并AC患者的风险而给予应有的重视和处理。
Evaluation of surgical risk in patients with liver cirrhosis and acute cholecystitis by cholecystitis severity grading and MELD scores
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the evaluation of surgical risk in patients with liver cirrhosis and acute cholecystitis(AC)by cholecystitis severity grading and model for end-stage liver disease(MELD)scores.Methods 92 patients with LC and AC were enrolled in our hospital between February 2021 and December 2022,and all patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC).Before operation,the AC severity was evaluated according to Tokyo Guidelines(2018),including grade I in 55 cases and grade Ⅱ/Ⅲ in 37 cases,and the MELD scores were calculated,including low risk(≤14)in 64 cases and moderately/high risk(>15)in 28 cases.The surgical risk was evaluated by multivariate Logistic regression analysis.Results The rates of conversion to laparotomy during LC were not significantly different among groups(P>0.05);the operation time in patients with cholecystitis grade Ⅱ/Ⅲ was(88.8±11.8)min,much longer than[(77.1±10.4)min,P<0.05],and intra-operational blood loss and peritoneal drainage were(91.4±18.7)mL and(339.7±40.7)mL,both significantly greater than[(79.5±12.2)mL and(285.9±36.4)mL,respectively,P<0.05]in patients with gradeⅠ,while there were no significant differences as respect to these surgical parameters between patients grouped on MELD scores(P>0.05);the incidence of post-operational complications,such as infection,bleeding and bile leakage in patients with gradeⅡ/Ⅲwas27.0%,much higher than 7.3%(P<0.05)in patients with gradeⅠ,and that was 28.6%in patients with high risk MELD scores,much higher than 9.4%(P<0.05)in patients with low risk MELD scores;the patients were then further divided into with(n=18)and without(n=74)surgical risk groups based on surgical complications,and the percentages of cholecystitis gradeⅡ/Ⅲand the high MELD scores in patients with surgical risk were 61.1%and 55.6%,both significantly higher than 35.1%and 24.3%(P<0.05)in those without surgical risk;the multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the cholecystitis grading and poor MELD scores were the independent risk factors for LC operation in cirrhotics with AC(P<0.05).Conclusion The surgeons should take the cholecystitis severity grading and MELD scores into consideration before LC operation in patients with liver cirrhosis and AC,and deal with appropriately.

Acute cholecystitisLiver cirrhosisLaparoscopic cholecystectomyCholecystitis severity gradingModel for end-stage liver diseaseTherapy

王东君、张春岩、晁祥嵩、李志、王兴权

展开 >

154002 黑龙江省佳木斯市中心医院普外一科

154002 黑龙江省佳木斯市中心医院心内二科

佳木斯大学附属第一医院普外科

急性胆囊炎 肝硬化 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术 胆囊炎分级 终末期肝病模型 治疗

黑龙江省卫生健康委科研项目

2020-365

2024

实用肝脏病杂志
中华医学会安徽分会

实用肝脏病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.362
ISSN:1672-5069
年,卷(期):2024.27(1)
  • 20