石油化工设备2024,Vol.53Issue(4) :47-54.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7466.2024.04.009

卸料臂与软管传输液化天然气的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Liquefied Natural Gas Transfer Method Between Marine Loading Arm and Flexible Hose

张蓬菲 张慧跃 苏娟 李俊 张国中 杨树
石油化工设备2024,Vol.53Issue(4) :47-54.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7466.2024.04.009

卸料臂与软管传输液化天然气的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Liquefied Natural Gas Transfer Method Between Marine Loading Arm and Flexible Hose

张蓬菲 1张慧跃 1苏娟 1李俊 1张国中 1杨树1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 海洋石油工程股份有限公司,天津 300461
  • 折叠

摘要

液化天然气(LNG)是一种清洁环保能源,需求量在不断增长.船船之间、船岸之间的LNG传输方式渐趋多样,如何选择LNG 传输方式成为相关工程项目的关键.用于船岸连接的LNG传输方式一般包括卸料臂和软管传输系统,以船并靠方式为例,从典型构造布局、安全系统、物理参数、工作环境条件、设计规范等方面介绍对比了卸料臂与软管传输系统的异同,探讨了2种传输方式主要优缺点.可为工程项目中LNG传输方式的选择及应用提供参考.

Abstract

Liquefied natural gas(LNG)is a clean and environmentally friendly energy source,and demand is growing.The LNG transfer modes of ship-to-ship and ship-to-shore are becoming more diverse,and the selection of LNG transfer modes has become the key to related engineering projects.The LNG transfer modes used for ship-to-shore connection generally include marine loading arm and flexible hose transfer system.Taking ship docking mode as an example,the similarities and differences between marine loading arm and flexible hose transfer system are introduced and compared from the aspects of typical structure layout,safety system,physical parameters,working environment conditions,design specifications,etc.,and the main advantages and disadvantages of the two transfer modes are discussed.It can provide reference for the selection and application of LNG transfer mode in engineering projects.

关键词

液化天然气/传输/卸料臂/软管/船岸连接/对比

Key words

liquefied natural gas/transfer/marine loading arm/flexible hose/ship-to-shore connection/comparation

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
石油化工设备
兰州石油机械研究所,中国石油和石油化工设备工业协会

石油化工设备

影响因子:0.465
ISSN:1000-7466
段落导航相关论文