首页|"穿透式监管"的适用与限制:金融工具、系统性风险与监管边界

"穿透式监管"的适用与限制:金融工具、系统性风险与监管边界

Application and Restriction on"Looking-Through Regulation":Financial Instrument,Systemic Risk and Regulation Boundary

扫码查看
在以融资为唯一诉求的市场背景下,我国金融市场及产品的创新自改革开放以来呈现一种以"监管套利"为主的演进特点,由此始终遭遇"合理"与"不合理"的非议与挑战.就目前我国金融监管的特点而言,在防止系统性风险的名义下越来越强调对于金融主体或者金融行为的"穿透式监管".然而如果无视金融工具自身的特性及由其所决定的金融监管应有的边界,对于金融工具的任意"穿透"可能不仅无益于有效监管的总体目标,还会扼杀金融市场按其自有规律前行的动力和基础.总体而言,金融监管的"穿透"只应是一种实现功能监管的辅助工具而非主要手段,更加科学的方式是在对"系统风险"与"系统性风险"进行区分识别的基础上实现"和而不同"的功能监管.
In the market context where financing is the sole demand,the innovation of China's financial market and products has shown an evolutionary characteristic mainly based on"regulatory arbitrage"since the reform and opening up,which has always faced criticism and challenges of being"reasonable"and"unreasonable".In terms of the current characteristics of financial regulation in China,there is an increasing emphasis on the"Looking-Through Regulation"of financial entities or behaviors under the guise of preventing systemic risks.However,if the characteristics of financial instruments themselves and the boundaries of financial regulation determined by them are ignored,arbitrary"looking-through"of financial instruments may not only be detrimental to the overall goal of effective regulation,but also stifle the driving force and foundation of financial markets to move forward according to their own laws.Overall,the"looking-through"of financial regulation should only be an auxiliary tool for achieving functional regulation rather than a primary means.A more scientific approach is to achieve"combined but different"functional regulation based on distinguishing and identifying"system risk"and"systemic risk".

financial instrumentLooking-Through Regulationsystemic riskfunctional regulation

郑彧

展开 >

华东政法大学 国际金融法律学院,上海 200042

金融工具 穿透式监管 系统性风险 功能监管

国家社会科学基金一般项目

22BFX093

2024

商业经济与管理
浙江工商大学

商业经济与管理

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.7
ISSN:1000-2154
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 49