首页|浅埋软岩大跨度隧道开挖工法研究

浅埋软岩大跨度隧道开挖工法研究

扫码查看
目的 研究浅埋软弱围岩大跨度隧道的开挖工法,为该类隧道工程的设计和施工提供理论参考.方法 采用FLAC3D有限差分软件,针对广州某大跨度隧道进口段在双侧壁导坑法、CRD法和三台阶七步法下的开挖进行数值模拟,分别对三种工法下的隧道拱顶下沉值、围岩水平位移值、塑性区以及最大和最小主应力进行对比分析.结果 在控制隧道拱顶下沉和拱脚水平位移及围岩应力集中现象方面,双侧壁导坑法均优于CRD法和三台阶七步法;在控制围岩塑性区方面,双侧壁导坑法与CRD法相差不大,但均优于三台阶七步法;三台阶七步法开挖相比双侧壁导坑法和CRD法更容易发生围岩失稳现象.结论 大跨度隧道浅埋软岩段的开挖不建议采用CRD法和三台阶七步法,而应优先考虑双侧壁导坑法.
Research on the Excavation Method of Large Span Tunnel in Shallow Buried and Soft Rock
The excavation method of large span tunnel in shallow buried and soft rock was studied in order to provide theoretical reference for the design and construction of the tunnel engineering.The FLAC3D finite difference software is used to numerical simulate the inlet of a large span tunnel in Guangzhou by the double side drift method,cross diaphragm method (CRD) and three-bench seven-step excavation method.Comparative and analysis the subsidence value of tunnel vault,the horizontal displacement of surrounding rock,plastic zone and the maximum and minimum principal stress under these three kinds of method.The results show that double side drift method is superior to the CRD method and the three-bench seven-step excavation method in controlling the sinking of tunnel vault,horizontal displacement of the arch foot and the stress concentration of the surrounding rock.Double side drift method is similar to the CRD method,both are superior to the threebench seven-step excavation method in controlling the plastic zone of the surrounding rock.The three-bench seven-step excavation method is more prone to happen instability phenomenon of the surrounding rock than the double side drift method and CRD method.It is advisable to give priority to use the double side drift method rather than use the CRD method and the three-bench seven-step excavation method of large span tunnel in shallow buried and soft rock.

shallow buried and soft rocklarge spantunnel excavationmethodnumerical calculation

朱苦竹、张书强、庄瑞鸿

展开 >

桂林理工大学土木与建筑工程学院,广西桂林541004

广西岩土力学与工程重点实验室,广西桂林541004

浅埋软岩 大跨度 隧道开挖 工法 数值计算

国家自然科学基金

41102202

2018

沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版)
沈阳建筑大学

沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版)

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.697
ISSN:2095-1922
年,卷(期):2018.34(1)
  • 13
  • 9