Comparison of the efficacy of 3 technics in the diagnosis of oral mucosal pemphigoid
Objective:To compare the efficacy of histopathology(HE),direct immunofluorescence(DIF)and serum anti-BP 180/BP230 antibody ELISA detection(BP 180/BP230)in the diagnosis of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid(MMP).Methods:53 pa-tients with MMP were included.HE,DIF and serum BP 180/230 test results were analyzed and compared.Results:MMP was finally diagnosed in 48 patients by the comprehensive utilization of the 3 techics.There were 8 males(16.7％)and 40 females(83.3％),aged 34-76 years(median age 62 years),with a median duration of 9 months and an interquartile range of 3-12 months.6 patients had ex-traoral sites involvement,including skin(n=3,6.3％),genitalia(n=2,4.2％)and throat(n=1,2.1％).The main site of oral mu-cosa involvement was gingiva(n=40,83.3％),followed by palate(n=22,45.8％),cheek(n=15,31.3％),tongue(n=4,8.3％)and lip(n=3,6.3％).The sensitivity of the routine HE combined with modified biopsy was 83.3％(40/48)and missed diagnosis rate was 16.7％(8/48);the sensitivity of DIF was 85.4％(41/48)and missed diagnosis rate was 14.6％(7/48);the sensitivity of BP180/230 was 47.9％(23/48)and missed diagnosis rate was 52.1％(25/48).The kappa coefficient of agreement between HE and DIFwas0.354(95％CI:0.060,0.648),between BP180/230 ELISA and DIF was-0.112(95％CI:-0.328,0.104),and be-tween HE and BP180/230 ELISA wasO.031(95％CI:-0.181,0.243).Conclusion:HE and DIF have similar effective rate for MMP diagnosis,and they can complement each other.ELISA detection can be used as a supplementary examination for the more accurate di-agnostic of MMP.
Direct immunofluorescenceEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assayDiagnostic yieldPemphigoid
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
