首页|经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗中等体积良性前列腺增生的效果及安全性比较

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗中等体积良性前列腺增生的效果及安全性比较

扫码查看
目的 比较经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(BPRP)治疗中等体积良性前列腺增生(BPH)的效果及安全性.方法 将85例中等体积BPH患者(前列腺体积30~80 mL)按手术方式不同分为经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗组(HoLEP组,n=46)和经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗组(BPRP组,n=39),比较2组手术相关指标(包括手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、尿管留置时间及膀胱冲洗时间等)、术后并发症及术前术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS评分)、生活质量评分(QOL评分)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿(PVR)等.结果 HoLEP组术后住院时间、术中出血量、尿管留置时间较BPRP组显著减少(P<0.05).2组术后IPSS评分、QOL评分、PVR值均较术前显著减少(P<0.01),Qmax值均较术前显著增加(P<0.01),且HoLEP组术后IPSS评分、QOL评分、Qmax值较BPRP组改善更为显著(P<0.05).2组均无电切综合征和输血不良事件发生,2组术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 HoLEP与BPRP治疗中等体积前列腺增生均安全有效;但与BPRP治疗相比,HoLEP治疗可显著缩短术后住院时间、尿管留置时间,减少术中出血量,同时在改善患者症状、提高患者生活质量方面效果更为显著.
Transurethral Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Plasma Bipolar Resection of the Prostate in Moderate Volume Prostatic Hyperplasia:a Comparative Study
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of transurethral holmium la-ser enucleation of the prostate(HoLEP)with transurethral plasma bipolar resection of the pros-tate(BPRP)in the treatment of patients with moderate volume prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods 85 patients with moderate volume BPH(prostate volume of 30-80 mL)were divided in-to the HoLEP group(n=46)and the BPRP group(n=39)based on surgical procedures;surgery-related indexes(including operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospitalization time,urethral catheter retention time and bladder irrigation time,etc.),postoperative complica-tions,and preoperative and postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS Score),Quality of Life Score(QOL Score),maximal urinary flow rate(Qmax),and residual urine(PVR)were compared between the 2 groups.Results Postoperative hospitalization time,intraoperative bleeding,and urethral retention time were significantly reduced in the HoLEP group compared with the BPRP group(P<0.05).Postoperative IPSS score,QOL score,and PVR value were sig-nificantly reduced in both groups compared with the preoperative period(P<0.01),and Qmax value was significantly increased compared with the preoperative period(P<0.01),and the improve-ment in the IPSS score,QOL score,and Qmax value of HoLEP group was more significant com-pared with the BPRP group(P<0.05).There were no electrotomy syndrome and adverse transfu-sion events in the 2 groups,and the difference in the incidence of postoperative complications be-tween the 2 groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion HoLEP and BPRP are both safe and effective in the treatment of patients with moderate volume BPH;compared with BPRP,HoLEP could significantly shorten postoperative hospitalization time,and urinary catheter retention time,and it could also reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding,alleviate patients'symptoms and improve the patients'quality of life more distinctly.

moderate volume prostatic hyperplasiatransurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostatetransurethral plasma bipolar resection of the prostateclinical efficacysafety

邱俊、倪路华、余良智、郑增斌

展开 >

上饶市人民医院泌尿外科,江西上饶 334100

上饶市人民医院超声医学科,江西上饶 334100

中等体积良性前列腺增生 经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术 临床效果 安全性

2024

实用临床医学
南昌大学

实用临床医学

影响因子:0.818
ISSN:1009-8194
年,卷(期):2024.25(3)
  • 4