钝针和锐针在眼台低平治疗的对比研究
A comparative study of blunt-needle and sharp-needle in the injection of lower-lid pretarsal-fullness
张子义 1李志容2
作者信息
- 1. 重庆华美整形外科医院微创美容科,重庆 400015
- 2. 重庆华美整形外科医院皮肤美容科,重庆 400015
- 折叠
摘要
目的 对比钝针和锐针在眼台注射治疗的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析自2022年5月至2023年6月,重庆华美整形外科医院同一医师采用相同填充剂、不同类型针头行眼台注射治疗的42例求美者资料.钝针组21例,锐针组21例,评价两组患者注射痛感、淤血发生率和术后患者满意度.结果 两组患者治疗中和治疗后痛感比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).钝针组在术中和术后淤血发生率低于锐针组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).两组患者术后满意度比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 两组患者在术中和术后痛感及术后满意度方面,均取得满意的结果,钝针在预防淤血并发症上优于锐针.
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect of blunt needle and sharp needle in the treatment of lower-lid pretarsal-fullness.Methods From May 2022 to June 2023,42 patients used the same material and different types of needles were retrospectively analyzed.Twenty-one patients were in blunt needle group and 21 patients in sharp needle group.The injection pain,congestion and postoperative satisfaction of the two groups were evaluated.Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative pain between the two groups(P＞0.05).The intraoperative and postoperative incidences of congestion of blunt needle group were lower than those of sharp needle group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative satisfaction be-tween the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Both groups achieved satisfactory results in intraoperative and postoperative pain and postop-erative satisfaction,and the blunt needle was better than the sharp needle in preventing congestion.
关键词
眼台/锐针/钝针/淤血/注射Key words
Pretarsal fullness/Sharp-needle/Blunt-needle/Congestion/Injection引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据