首页|致密砂砾岩成储界限及分级评价标准——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷白垩系沙河子组为例

致密砂砾岩成储界限及分级评价标准——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷白垩系沙河子组为例

扫码查看
徐家围子断陷下白垩统沙河子组砂砾岩储层是松辽盆地深部重要的致密气藏储层,其孔渗关系复杂,给成储界限的厘定和储层分级评价带来挑战.针对沙河子组砂砾岩储层,采用水膜厚度法、充注动力法、试气产能法和力学平衡法厘定了理论下限、成藏下限、有效渗流下限和成储上限,根据不同成岩作用主控因素下的孔渗关系确定成储界限物性值.在此基础上,结合储层微观孔隙结构差异划分储层类型,建立致密储层分级评价标准,并利用测井资料将分级评价标准进行应用,为研究区致密气甜点区优选提供依据.将沙河子组砂砾岩分为常规储层、Ⅰ—Ⅳ级致密砂砾岩储层和非储层,成储界限与分级评价结果具有很好的匹配关系.其中,常规储层孔隙度大于9%,渗透率大于0.05×10-3 μm2;Ⅰ级致密储层孔隙度为8%~9%,渗透率为(0.01~0.05)×10-3 μm2;Ⅱ级致密储层孔隙度为5%~8%,渗透率为(0.001~0.01)×10-3 µm2;Ⅲ级致密储层孔隙度为3.5%~5%,渗透率为(0.2~1)×10-6 μm2;Ⅳ级致密储层孔隙度为2%~3.5%,渗透率为(0.05~0.2)× 10-6 µm2;非储层的孔隙度小于2%,渗透率小于0.05×10-6 μm2.致密砂砾岩气产量受控于致密储层类型;Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级致密储层是致密气高产的有利层段;徐家围子断陷北部安达—宋站地区有利储层厚度较大,为致密气勘探开发甜点区.
Reservoir limits and grading evaluation criteria of tight glutenite:a case study of Cretaceous Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression,Songliao Basin
The Lower Cretaceous Shahezi Formation glutenite reservoirs in the Xujiaweizi Fault Depression are important tight gas reservoirs in the deep strata of the Songliao Basin.Their complex porosity and permeability relation-ships pose challenges to determining reservoir boundaries and evaluating reservoir grades.For the Shahezi Forma-tion glutenite reservoirs,the water film thickness method,charge dynamics method,gas testing productivity method,and buoyancy balance method were used to determine theoretical lower limits,gas accumulation lower limits,effective flow lower limits,and reservoir-forming upper limits.The petrophysical values of the reservoir boundaries were determined based on the porosity and permeability relationships under different diagenetic controlling factors.On this basis,reservoir types were classified according to differences in microscopic pore structures,and a grading evaluation standard for tight reservoirs was established.This standard was then applied using logging data to provide a basis for selecting sweet spots in the tight gas exploration areas.The Shahezi Formation glutenite was divided into conventional reservoirs,Class Ⅰ-Ⅳ tight glutenite reservoirs,and non-reservoirs.The reservoir boundaries and classification evaluation results were well matched.Conventional reservoirs had porosity greater than 9%and permeability greater than 0.05×10-3 μm2.Class Ⅰ tight reservoirs had porosity of 8%-9%and permeability of(0.01-0.05)× 10-3 μm2.Class Ⅱ tight reservoirs had porosity of 5%-8%and permeability of(0.001-0.01)×10-3 μm2.Class Ⅲ tight reservoirs had porosity of 3.5%-5%and permeability of(0.2-1)×10-3μm2.Class Ⅳ tight reservoirs had porosity of 2%-3.5%and permeability of(0.05-0.2)×10-6 μm2.Non-reservoirs had porosity less than 2%and permeability less than 0.05×10-6 μm2.The gas production of tight glutenite was controlled by the reservoir type.Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ tight reservoirs were favorable high-yield layers.The thick-ness of favorable reservoirs in the Anda-Songzhan area of the northern Xujiaweizi Fault Depression was large,making it a sweet spot for tight gas exploration and development.

tight glutenite gasreservoir limitgrading evaluationsweet spot evaluationXujiaweizi Fault DepressionShahezi FormationSongliao Basin

王军杰、卢双舫、林子智、周能武、张鹏飞、黄宏胜、郅琪、李柏知

展开 >

东北石油大学三亚海洋油气研究院,海南三亚 572025

东北石油大学陆相页岩油气成藏及高效开发教育部重点实验室,黑龙江大庆 163318

中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院,山东青岛 266580

山东科技大学地球科学与工程学院,山东青岛 266590

展开 >

致密砂砾岩气 成储界限 分级评价 甜点评价 徐家围子断陷 沙河子组 松辽盆地

国家自然科学基金山东省自然科学基金

42272156ZR2020QD036

2024

石油实验地质
中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院 中国地质学会石油地质专业委员会

石油实验地质

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.409
ISSN:1001-6112
年,卷(期):2024.46(3)
  • 40