Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids(RPH)combined with milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy(MMH)in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids compared with MMH alone.Methods:Relevant literature was retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang,and VIP databases from their establishment to Jan 2023 using computers.Clinical randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of RPH combined with MMH and MMH alone in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids were selected and analyzed,and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.3 software.Results:A total of 30 RCTs were included,involving 4 609 patients.Results of Meta-analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in surgical efficacy(RR=1.05,95% CI:1.02-1.08,P= 0.003),postoperative margin edema(RR=0.36,95% CI:0.27-0.49,P＜0.01),postoperative anal pain(RR=0.35,95% CI:0.23-0.53,P＜0.01),postoperative rectal bleeding(RR=0.35,95% CI:0.17-0.72,P=0.004),postoperative anal stenosis(RR=0.26,95% CI:0.11-0.59,P=0.001)and postoperative urinary retention(RR=0.77,95% CI:0.63-0.93,P=0.007)between RPH combined with MMH group and MMH group.Conclusion:Compared with MMH alone,RPH combined with MMH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids can reduce the incidence of postoperative side effects,such as postoperative margin edema,anal pain,rectal bleeding,anal stenosis,and urinary retention,with a relatively higher efficiency.
关键词
自动套扎术/传统外剥内扎术/混合痔/Meta分析
Key words
Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids/traditional milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy/mixed hemorrhoids/meta-analysis
维普
万方数据