首页|无创冠状动脉生理功能评估技术对慢性冠脉综合征治疗价值的研究

无创冠状动脉生理功能评估技术对慢性冠脉综合征治疗价值的研究

扫码查看
目的 研究无创冠状动脉生理功能评估技术(FFRCT)指导慢性冠脉综合征(CCS)治疗的价值.方法 纳入150 例稳定胸痛并拟行冠状动脉造影(ICA)检查的CCS患者,采用随机数字法分为ICA组、FFR组及FFRCT组各50 例.ICA组根据冠脉造影提示狭窄≥70%的病变进行经皮冠脉介入术(PCI),FFR组对冠脉造影提示狭窄≥50%且FFR值<0.75 的病变行PCI,FFRCT组对冠脉造影提示狭窄≥50%且CTFFR值<0.75 的病变行PCI.对上述纳入研究的患者在 1、3、6、12 个月分别通过访视、电话或病历查阅进行随访心血管不良事件,包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、靶向及非靶向血管PCI、心绞痛复发及心力衰竭等.结果 相对于FFR组,FFRCT组诊断CCS的ROC曲线下面积为 0.873,95%CI 0.762~0.984,Cut-off值0.82.相对于 ICA 组,FFR 组及 FFRCT 组指导的介入治疗支架数量较少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但 FFR 组与FFRCT组之间的支架数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).FFRCT组不良事件的发生率低于ICA组和FFR组(P<0.05).结论 FFRCT诊断CCS具有较高的敏感度和特异度,可明显降低支架植入数量,减少CCS患者心血管不良事件发生率.
The value of CT derived fractional flow reserve in the treatment of chronic coronary syndromes
Objective To investigate the value of FFRCT in the treatment of chronic coronary syndrome(CCS).Methods One hundred and fifty CCS patients with stable chest pain and planned coronary angiography(ICA)tests were included.They were divided into an ICA group,a FFR group and a FFRCT group by using random number table,50 in each group.The ICA group underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)based on lesions with stenosis≥70%indicated by coronary angiography.The FFR group underwent PCI based on coronary angiography indicated stenosis≥50%.The FFRCT group underwent PCI based on coronary angiography indicated stenosis≥50%and CTFFR value<0.75.All of patients were followed up for mainly cardiovascular adverse events by visit,telephone or medical record at the 1st,3rd,6th,and 12th month,respectively.Cardiovascular adverse events included major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE),targeted and non-targeted vascular PCI,recurrence of angina and heart failure.Results Compare to the FFR group,the area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of CCS in the FFRCT group was 0.873(95%CI:0.762-0.984)and the cut-off value was0.82.Compared with the ICA group,the interventional treatments guided by the FFR group and the FFRCT group were statistically reduced(P<0.05),but the number of stents between the FFR group and the FFRCT group was no significant difference(P>0.05).Compared with the ICA group and the FFRR group,cardiovascular adverse events was the lowest in the FFRCT group(P<0.05).Conclusions The sensitivity and specificity of FFRCT diagnosis for CCS are high.FFRCT can significantly reduce the number of stent implants and greatly delay and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients with CCS.

FFRCTChronic coronary syndromesArtificial intelligenceCardiovascular adverse events

高洁、付明欢、陶雪飞、陈晓涵、程标

展开 >

四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院,四川 成都 610072

无创冠状动脉生理功能评估技术 慢性冠脉综合征 人工智能 心血管不良事件

四川省科技计划重点研发项目

2020YFS0432

2024

实用医院临床杂志
四川省医学科学院 四川省人民医院

实用医院临床杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.179
ISSN:1672-6170
年,卷(期):2024.21(2)
  • 20