首页|中医药联合水飞蓟宾治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)系统评价与Meta分析

中医药联合水飞蓟宾治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)系统评价与Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价中医药联合水飞蓟宾胶囊治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者的有效性及安全性.方法 检索 CNKI、VIP、万方、CBM、PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMbase、Web of science 数据库,检索时间为建库至 2022 年 2 月 27日,对纳入的文献进行资料提取和质量评价,采用RevMan5.4、prism8.0、Statal7.0软件进行分析与评价.结果 最终纳入31项RCTs,2639例患者.结果显示,(1)治疗疗程、给药方式、药物剂型以及地区分布对治疗有效率均有影响,疗程≤ 1 月[OR=3.68,Z 值=4.88,P<0.000 01],1 月<疗程≤2月[OR=5.90,Z 值=5.03,P<0.000 01],2 月<疗程≤3 月[OR=4.59,Z 值=7.62,P<0.000 01],疗程≤ 6 月[OR=3.05,Z 值=3.5,P<0.000 01];试验组以内服中药联合给药[OR=3.88,Z值=9.62,P<0.00001],以中医药内服外治联合给药[OR=7.82,Z值=5.23,P<0.000 01];试验组以水煎剂联合给药[OR=3.95,Z值=7.53,P<0.000 01],试验组以颗粒剂联合给药[OR=3.28,Z值=4.36,P<0.000 01],试验组以中成药联合给药[OR=4.92,Z 值=4.2,P<0.000 01];华东[OR=3.1,Z 值=4.58,P<0.000 01],华中[OR=5.33,Z 值=5.65,P<0.000 01],华南[OR=5.82,Z 值=4.54,P<0.000 01],西北[OR=4.04,Z 值=5.88,P<0.000 01],试验组与对照组比较有差异;(2)实验室指标方面,肝功能(ALT、AST、r-GT)、血脂(TG、TC、LDL-C、HDL-C)、CAP、TCM Score 存在统计学差异,炎症指标(IL-6、TNF-α)、FBG 无统计学差异,ALT(MD=10.88,95%CI:8.94~12.82,P<0.000 01),AST(MD=10.44,95%CI:8.35~12.53,P<0.000 01),r-GT(MD=12.69,95%CI:9.17~16.21,P<0.000 01),TG(MD=0.45,95%CI:0.35~0.56,P<0.000 01),TC(MD=0.79,95%CI:0.44~1.13,P<0.000 01),LDL-C(MD=0.78,95%CI:0.43~1.13,P<0.000 01),HDL-C(MD=-0.27,95%CI:-0.30~-0.24,P<0.000 01),CAP(MD=29.13,95%CI:22.72~35.53,P<0.000 01),TCM Score(MD=4.95,95%CI:3.43~6.46,P<0.000 01),IL-6(MD=4.52,95%CI:0.87~8.17,P=0.02),TNF-α(MD=5.21,95%CI:-0.03~10.45,P=0.05),FBG(MD=0.2,95%CI:0.01~0.39,P=0.04).结论 中医药联合水飞蓟宾治疗NAFLD疗效显著,能改善临床症状及部分实验室指标,无明显不良反应.另外有必要联合多组学、铁死亡或关联肠道菌群去探究获得NAFLD的观察指标,规范中医诊断和纳入标准,开展更多高质量的临床实验加以验证.
Systematic Evaluation and Meta-analysis of Chinese Medicine Combined with Silymarin in Treatment of NAFLD
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Chinese medicine combined with silymarin cap-sules in the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD).Methods CNKI,Vip,Wanfang,CBM,PubMed,Cochrane Library,EMbase and Web of science databases were searched by computer which were conducted from the pe-riod of building to February 27,2022.The data extraction and quality evaluation of the included literature were performed by u-sing RevMan 5.4,prism 8.0 and Stata 17.0 software for analysis and evaluation.Results The final 31 randomized controlled tri-als(RCTs)with 2639 patients were included.(1)Meta-analysis showed that treatment duration,administration mode,drug dos-age form and regional distribution all had an effect on treatment efficiency,treatment course≤1 month[OR=3.68,Z value=4.88,P<0.000 01],1 month<treatment course ≤2 months[OR=5.90,Z value=5.03,P<0.000 01],2 months<treatment course ≤3 months[OR=4.59,Z value=7.62,P<0.000 01],treatment course ≤6 months[OR=3.05,Z value=3.5,P<0.000 01];combined administration of traditional Chinese medicine within the test group[OR=3.88,Z-value=9.62,P<0.000 01],combined administration of traditional Chinese medicine orally and externally[OR=7.82,Z-value=5.23,P<0.000 01];the test group was administered in combination with granules[OR=3.95,Z-value=7.53,P<0.000 01];the test group was administered with traditional Chinese patent medicines and simple preparations[OR=3.28,Z-value=4.36,P<0.000 01],CPD[OR=4.92,Z-value=4.2,P<0.000 01];EC[OR=3.1,Z-value=4.58,P<0.000 01],CC[OR=5.33,Z-value=5.65,P<0.000 01],SC[OR=5.82,Z-value=4.54,P<0.000 01],NW[OR=4.04,Z-value=5.88,P<0.000 01],and there were differences between the test group and the control group.(2)There were statistical differences in la-boratory indicators,liver function[alanine aminotransferase(ALT),glutathione aminotransferase(AST),glutamyl transpeptidase(r-GT)],blood lipids[triglycerides(TG),total cholesterol(TC),low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C),high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C)],liver controlled attenuation parameter(CAP),TCM score,and inflammatory indicators[inter-leukin-6(IL-6),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)].There was no statistically significant difference in fasting blood glu-cose(FBG)or ALT(MD=10.88,95%CI:8.94~12.82,P<0.000 01),AST(MD=10.44,95%CI:8.35~12.53,P<0.000 01),r-GT(MD=12.69,95%CI:9.17~16.21,P<0.000 01),TG(MD=0.45,95%CI:0.35~0.56,P<0.000 01),TC(MD=0.79,95%CI:0.44~1.13,P<0.000 01),LDL-C(MD=0.78,95%CI:0.43~1.13,P<0.000 01),HDL-C(MD=-0.27,95%CI:-0.30~-0.24,P<0.000 01),CAP(MD=29.13,95%CI:22.72~35.53,P<0.000 01),TCM score(MD=4.95,95%CI:3.43~6.46,P<0.000 01),IL-6(MD=4.52,95%CI:0.87~8.17,P=0.02),TNF-α(MD=5.21,95%CI:-0.03~10.45,P=0.05)and FBG(MD=0.2,95%CI:O.01~0.39,P=0.04).Con-clusion Chinese medicine combined with silymarin was effective in the treatment of NAFLD,improving clinical symptoms and some laboratory indices without significant adverse effects.In addition,it is necessary to combine multiple omics,iron death and gut microbiota to explore the NAFLD's observation indicators,standardize traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and inclusion criteria,and conduct more high-quality clinical experiments to verify.

non-alcoholic fatty liver diseasetraditional Chinese medicinesilymarinmeta analysis

何婷婷、钱涯邻、方南元、孙静云、张丽君、向晓星

展开 >

苏北人民医院,江苏扬州 225001

南京中医药大学第一临床医学院,江苏南京 210023

非酒精性脂肪性肝病 中医药 水飞蓟宾胶囊 Meta分析

江苏省中医药科技发展计划

MS2021078

2024

实用中医内科杂志
辽宁省中医药学会,中华中医药学会,辽宁省中医药研究院

实用中医内科杂志

影响因子:0.421
ISSN:1671-7813
年,卷(期):2024.38(1)
  • 32