首页|探讨开放式针孔护理和封闭针孔护理在下肢骨牵引患者中的临床效果

探讨开放式针孔护理和封闭针孔护理在下肢骨牵引患者中的临床效果

扫码查看
目的 分析下肢骨牵引患者应用开放式针孔护理和封闭式针孔护理的效果.方法 择取2017年5月—2018年5月于该院收治的下肢骨牵引患者82例, 按照随机分配原则分成两组, 即对照组和研究组, 对照组采取开放式针孔护理, 研究组采取封闭式针孔护理, 对两组的护理效果进行对比.结果 研究组护理后并发症发生率明显低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义 (χ2=8.613, P<0.05);研究组护理满意度显著高于对照组, 差异有统计学意义 (χ2=5.513, P<0.05) .结论 对于下肢骨牵引患者而言, 封闭式针孔护理的效果明显好于开放式针孔护理, 且护理后患者的满意度非常高, 值得进一步的推广和使用.
Objective to Explore the Clinical Effect of Open Needle-hole Nursing and Closed Needle-hole Nursing in Patients with Lower Limb Bone Traction
Objective To analyze the effect of open needle-hole nursing and closed needle-hole nursing in patients with lower limb bone traction. Methods 82 cases of lower limb bone traction patients admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were selected and divided into two groups according to the principle of random distribution, namely, the control group and the research group.The control group adopted open needle-hole nursing, and the research group adopted closed needle-hole nursing. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.613, P<0.05).Nursing satisfaction in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.513, P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with lower limb bone traction, the effect of closed needle-hole nursing is significantly better than that of open needle-hole nursing, and the satisfaction of patients after nursing is very high, which is worth further promotion and use.

Patients with lower limb bone tractionOpen needle-hole nursingClosed needle hole nursingThe effect

相娜

展开 >

日照港口医院,山东日照 276800

下肢骨牵引患者 开放式针孔护理 封闭式针孔护理 效果

2019

双足与保健
中国足部反射区健康法研究会

双足与保健

影响因子:0.014
ISSN:1004-6569
年,卷(期):2019.(6)
  • 2
  • 7