首页|慢性牙周炎患牙拔除后即刻与早期拔牙位点保存术的疗效对比分析

慢性牙周炎患牙拔除后即刻与早期拔牙位点保存术的疗效对比分析

扫码查看
目的:分析慢性牙周炎患者患牙拔除后,即刻与早期拔牙位点保存术对拔牙位点骨量保存的疗效差异。方法:选取 2023 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月中山市中医院口腔科门诊收治的因慢性牙周炎导致无保留价值的后牙患者45 例,将患者随机分为A、B、C三组,每组 15 例。A组为对照组,拔牙后清除感染组织,不进行位点保存,自然愈合;B组行即刻拔牙位点保存术;C组行早期拔牙位点保存术。三组患者均于术前及术后 4 个月进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查,通过影像软件重叠同一位点影像,测量并比较牙槽骨的各维度空间骨量以及水平、垂直方向的骨量变化。结果:术后4个月,C组患者各维度空间骨量均高于A组、B组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。C组患者水平方向和垂直方向骨量变化均明显低于A组、B组,且B组垂直方向骨量变化低于A组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论:早期拔牙位点保存术与即刻拔牙位点保存术均能一定程度上维持骨量,但早期拔牙位点保存术操作难度较低,手术时间短,术后反应小,因此慢性牙周炎患者患牙拔除后,可优先选择早期拔牙位点保存术作为拔牙后位点保存的方法。
Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Immediate and Early Extraction Site Preservation in Patients with Chronic Periodontitis
Objective To analyze the difference between immediate and early extraction site preservation of bone mass in patients with chronic periodontitis.Methods A total of 45 patients with posterior teeth with no retention value due to chronic periodontitis admitted to the Stomatology Department of Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to January 2024 were selected and randomly divided into three groups,A,B and C,with 15 patients in each group.Group A was the control group,after tooth extraction,the infected tissue was cleared without site preservation and natural healing was performed.Group B underwent immediate extraction site preservation.Group C underwent early extraction site preservation.All patients in the three groups underwent cone beam computer tomography(CBCT)examination before surgery and 4 months after surgery.The images of the same site were overlaped by imaging software to measure and compare the spatial bone mass of alveolar bone in all dimensions and the changes of bone mass in horizontal and vertical directions.Results Four months after surgery,the spatial bone mass of patients in group C was higher than that in group A and group B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The changes of horizontal and vertical bone mass in group C were lower than those in group A and group B,and the change in vertical bone mass in group B were lower than that in group A,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Both early extraction site preservation and immediate extraction site preservation can maintain bone mass to a certain extent,but early extraction site preservation is less difficult to operate,the operation time is short,and the postoperative reaction is small,therefore,after tooth extraction in patients with chronic periodontitis,the preservation of early extraction site can be preferred as the method of post-extraction site preservation.

Chronic periodontitisImmediate extraction site preservationEarly extraction site preservation

欧阳瑾、周虹宇、陈露、李洁婷

展开 >

中山市中医院,广东 中山 528400

慢性牙周炎 即刻拔牙位点保存术 早期拔牙位点保存术

中山卫生健康局医学科研项目

2023A020415

2024

深圳中西医结合杂志
深圳市中西医结合临床研究所

深圳中西医结合杂志

影响因子:0.692
ISSN:1007-0893
年,卷(期):2024.34(15)