唐山师范学院学报2024,Vol.46Issue(2) :127-132.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9115.2024.02.025

比较法视野下欺诈交易行为的刑民界分

The Criminal and Civil Boundary of Fraudulent Transactions Behavior from the Perspective of Comparative Law

王与萱
唐山师范学院学报2024,Vol.46Issue(2) :127-132.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9115.2024.02.025

比较法视野下欺诈交易行为的刑民界分

The Criminal and Civil Boundary of Fraudulent Transactions Behavior from the Perspective of Comparative Law

王与萱1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 北京理工大学法学院 ,北京 100081
  • 折叠

摘要

在欺诈交易的场合,因存在双向给付行为,致使欺诈交易定性的刑民界限模糊.从财产损失要件而言,学界主张引入目的失败论等个别化财产损失理论对整体财产损失进行修正,但从我国诈骗罪的立法模式来看,个别化的损失并不适宜.对于欺诈交易中的非法占有目的,实务中也缺乏衡量标准.对此,首先考量欺骗行为是否能够达到诈骗犯罪的程度,其次坚持整体财产损失观,最后综合上述因素,进行对价衡量,判断行为人是否具有非法占有目的.

Abstract

In the occasion of fraudulent transactions,the boundary between criminal and civilian is blurred because of two-way payment behavior.In terms of the elements of property loss,the academic community advocates the introduction of individual property loss theories such as purpose failure theory to revise the overall property loss.However,from the perspective of the legislative model of the crime of fraud in our country,the individual loss is not suitable.For the purpose of illegal possession in fraudulent transactions,there is a lack of measurement standards in practice.In this regard,the first consideration is whether deceptive behavior can reach the level of fraud,followed by adhering to the concept of overall property loss,and finally,taking into account the above factors,conducting a value measurement to deter-mine whether the perpetrator has the purpose of illegal possession.

关键词

诈骗罪/民事欺诈/财产损失要件/整体财产损失

Key words

crime of fraud/civil fraud/elements of property damage/whole property loss

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
唐山师范学院学报
唐山师范学院

唐山师范学院学报

影响因子:0.204
ISSN:1009-9115
参考文献量23
段落导航相关论文