首页|正当防卫中不法侵害"紧迫性"判断的类型化建构

正当防卫中不法侵害"紧迫性"判断的类型化建构

扫码查看
不法侵害紧迫性的判断是适用正当防卫制度的关键,然而《刑法》的规定并不明确.我国关于正当防卫紧迫性的主流学说为"事后判断说",其对防卫人过于苛求且具有片面性,已无法适应司法实践新潮流.应以"防卫人合理确信说"为学说基础,对正当防卫中不法侵害紧迫性的判断标准进行类型化处理,以促进我国正当防卫制度真正实现法理与情理的统一.
The Typological Construction of the Urgency Judgment for Justifiable Defense in Unlawful Infringement
The judgment of the urgency of unlawful infringement is the key to the application of the le-gitimate defense system,but the Criminal Law does not clearly stipulate it.The mainstream theory on the urgency of legitimate defense in China is the ex post facto judgment theory,which imposes excessive de-mands on the defender and can no longer adapt to the new trend of judicial practice.The"reasonable con-viction of the defender"should be used as the theoretical basis to typify the judgment criteria of the urgen-cy of unlawful infringement in legitimate defense,so as to promote the real unity of legal principles and reason in Chinese legitimate defense system.

justifiable defenseunlawful infringementurgencytypification

李天娇

展开 >

河北农业大学人文社会科学学院,河北保定 071000

正当防卫 不法侵害 紧迫性 类型化

国家社会科学基金青年项目

21CFX021

2024

唐山师范学院学报
唐山师范学院

唐山师范学院学报

影响因子:0.204
ISSN:1009-9115
年,卷(期):2024.46(4)
  • 12