首页|"匪""非"关系辨析兼及读音问题

"匪""非"关系辨析兼及读音问题

扫码查看
通过比照出土文献与传世文献用字差异,从古书注解以及其他典籍引文等材料分析,可知主要集中于《诗经》《易经》等先秦早期典籍中的"匪",并不是"非"的借字,它记录的是一个独立的虚词."匪""非"为同源词,二者音近义同,"匪"不宜视为通"非",故不从"非"读平声,而读上声.这一用法的"匪"具有典雅性,现代汉语书面语中仍保留于"受益匪浅""匪夷所思"等词中.
On the Relationship between"fei"(匪)and"fei"(非)and the Pronunciation Confusion
By comparing the differences in the use of characters between unearthed literature and pas-sed down literature,and analyzing materials such as annotations on ancient books and citations from other classics,it can be concluded that"fei"(匪)mainly concentrated in early pre-Qin classics like The Book of Songs and The Book of Changes.It is not a phonetic loan character for"fei"(非),but an independent function word."fei"(匪)and"fei"(非)are cognate words,and the two have similar sounds and mean-ings."fei"(匪)should not be considered as a phonetic loan character for"fei"(非)and its tone should be falling-rising,but not flat as"fei"(非).The usage of"fei"(匪)as a negative adverb has cultural signifi-cance,so it is still retained in modern written Chinese with words such as"huoyifeiqian"(获益匪浅)and"feiyisuosi"(匪夷所思).

"fei"(匪)"fei"(非)negative adverbpronunciationMo-tse

张萍

展开 >

上海大学文学院,上海 200444

否定副词 读音 《墨子》

国家社会科学基金青年项目

19CYY033

2024

唐山师范学院学报
唐山师范学院

唐山师范学院学报

影响因子:0.204
ISSN:1009-9115
年,卷(期):2024.46(5)